Landlords face paying National Insurance on rental income
Millions of landlords could be hit by a plan to impose National Insurance contributions on rental income to generate around £2 billion in additional revenue.
Treasury sources have told The Times that the Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, wants to target ‘unearned income’.
The idea is being floated to tackle a £40 billion deficit in public finances, and it is being championed by some Labour MPs.
In doing so, Ms Reeves will maintain her bid to avoid breaching pre-election commitments not to increase VAT, income tax or existing National Insurance rates.
Landlords could sell up
Critics of the plan are already lining up with Sarah Coles, the head of personal finance at Hargreaves Lansdown, saying: “The British love affair with property could be tested to destruction.
“The latest Budget rumour is that National Insurance could be payable on the profits from rental income.
“Property is already one of the least tax-efficient ways to invest, and by adding to the mountain of tax paid by landlords, it may persuade even more of them to sell up.”
She added that landlords already face an array of taxes including a stamp duty surcharge, paying income tax on profits from rental income and because the income tax thresholds have been frozen since 2021, more landlords are paying higher rates and facing bigger tax bills.
Landlords have ‘unearned income’
The Times reports sources close to the Budget preparations saying that applying National Insurance to rental income would broaden the scope of earnings subject to the levy, rather than altering its rate.
That’s a nuance likened to the recent decision to impose VAT on private school fees.
One Labour insider said: “Property income is a significant potential extra source of funds.”
They added that landlords were seen as a way of targeting ‘unearned revenue’.
Official data shows that net property income reached £27 billion in 2022-23, so an 8% National Insurance charge on this amount could yield £2.18 billion.
Smaller landlords hit
However, the structure of the levy could disproportionately impact smaller landlords.
For instance, those earning between £50,000 and £70,000, a group of 360,000 landlords generating £4.76 billion, could face an additional annual bill of £1,057 if the standard 8% rate is applied.
The existing National Insurance framework reduces to 2% for earnings above £50,000, which could exacerbate the burden on smaller property owners.
The proposal, initially floated by the Resolution Foundation last September under the leadership of Torsten Bell, who has since become a Labour MP and key figure in Ms Reeves’s budget team, was shelved but has resurfaced as a viable option.
With 2.2 million individuals reporting property income and 19% of households renting privately, according to the English Housing Survey, the policy could have far-reaching implications.
Accelerate the landlord exodus
Shaun Moore, a tax and financial planning expert at Quilter, said: “The proposal to apply National Insurance to rental income would be another significant blow to the buy to let sector, which has already been squeezed from all angles in recent years.
“Introducing an additional tax burden risks accelerating the exodus of landlords from the market, further reducing the supply of rental properties at a time when demand remains high.”
He added: “This imbalance will inevitably push rents even higher, worsening affordability for tenants and deepening the housing crisis.
“Similarly, the addition of NI would almost certainly be passed on to renters through higher rents, compounding the problem.”
Comments
Have Your Say
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Landlords face severe consequences for unsafe housing in HarlowNext Article
Mystic Mortar Landlord Horoscope 29 Aug 2025Related Articles
8 months ago | 6 comments
8 months ago | 14 comments
Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 1630 - Articles: 3
7:52 PM, 2nd September 2025, About 7 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Beaver at 02/09/2025 – 17:07
Yes, she actually believed she was up to the job. More worrying is Starmer agreed.
Member Since July 2023 - Comments: 15
7:56 AM, 3rd September 2025, About 7 months ago
They blamed the Tories for the £22B black hole left behind. Who are they blaming for the £40-50B hole now?
Member Since May 2024 - Comments: 46
8:10 AM, 3rd September 2025, About 7 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Conscientious Landlord at 03/09/2025 – 07:56
And that’s after having already raised taxes by £40 billion last October. Oh and promising not to come back for more in 2025…
Member Since November 2024 - Comments: 81
10:16 AM, 3rd September 2025, About 7 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Beaver at 02/09/2025 – 17:07
I dont feel sorry for Rachel from Accounts – she seems unqualified in economics – strategy, long term consequences of changes, unintended consequences etc leading to a massive wrecking of the UK economy with massive harm to the UK only as someone incompetant given the reigns can – she didnt have to take the role and should be replaced.
Member Since August 2016 - Comments: 1190
10:30 AM, 3rd September 2025, About 7 months ago
Reply to the comment left by A Reader at 03/09/2025 – 10:16
I don’t feel sorry for her she’s nothing but a liar. And she talks like a robot whose batteries are running out. An incredibly weird personality like something straight out of a sci fi film. And she has zero talent. Fiddled her expenses at HBOS and lied about her time at the Bank Of England. The most self deluded marxist Chancellor we’ve ever had.
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 1997
10:36 AM, 3rd September 2025, About 7 months ago
Reply to the comment left by NewYorkie at 02/09/2025 – 19:52
And that’s really my point. I think Keir Starmer is a teflon man.
Member Since May 2024 - Comments: 46
10:52 AM, 3rd September 2025, About 7 months ago
The last autumn budget was on the 30th October, the next one isn’t until the 26th November. The latest possible date. Why might that be?
Member Since February 2024 - Comments: 69
11:03 AM, 3rd September 2025, About 7 months ago
I think budget is later because it gives her and government more time to put things in place and it’s going to be a hammer blow to the middle classes. Move your cash out now…..
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 1997
1:59 PM, 3rd September 2025, About 7 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Sally Robinson at 03/09/2025 – 11:03
I’m not sure what ‘middle-class’ or ‘worker’ really means. Middle-income is as likely to mean plumber or electrician as it is to mean doctor or nurse.
In employment terms 61% of the economy is small business and it accounts for over half of turnover. If the government keeps hurting that, as they are doing, then they aren’t going to get economic growth.
Member Since October 2023 - Comments: 201
2:06 PM, 3rd September 2025, About 7 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Sally Robinson at 03/09/2025 – 11:03
I think she is putting back the budget to the end of November, so that there is no time for landlords to bail out of the rental market (any tax changes would apply from April 6th next year).
That only gives landlords 4 months to get everything done, which is very tight, especially if the tenants fight the notice.