1 year ago | 17 comments
Landlords could face an eye-watering £28k to upgrade their properties to meet EPC C targets with student landlords being hardest hit.
Analysis by The Telegraph using public EPC and census data revals that university towns and cities have the highest concentration of inefficient homes, where many properties have an EPC score of D or lower.
The news comes after The Telegraph also reveals how despite Energy Secretary, Ed Miliband, forcing landlords to meet EPC C targets, his own home barely scraped an EPC C target despite installing a heat pump.
According to The Telegraph, one student neighbourhood in Hyde Park, Leeds saw one in six rental homes failing to meet EPC C targets. The average EPC score was 57, in the D band, with costs ranging from £13,700 to £28,700 to upgrade to a C rating.
Other student areas like Lenton (Nottingham), Fallowfield (Manchester), and Selly Oak (Birmingham) also had a high concentration of inefficient homes. Upgrading properties in these areas could cost between £9,000 and £27,000 depending on location.
The National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) warns many student landlords will simply decide to sell up rather than upgrade properties due to the expense.
Chris Norris, policy director of the NRLA, told The Telegraph: “Almost all student landlords with property below an EPC C would have to work towards the 2028 deadline since most students only stay one academic year.
“While landlords could use the void period in summer to make the upgrades. If a large volume of providers in an area all try to book in works at the same time, there simply will not be sufficient tradespeople to carry out the works.”
He adds: “Student landlords are looking at a very difficult period over the next few years as the combination of the Renters’ Rights Bill reforms and the Domestic Minimum Energy Efficiency Standard hits.”
One mortgage broker warns many student homes will be unable to meet EPC C targets and many landlords will drive rents up as a result.
Sean Horton, of broker Respect Mortgages, told The Telegraph: “It’s not just about slapping in some insulation, many student homes are large, older properties, needing major work.
“The timing couldn’t be worse. With margins already squeezed by regulatory changes and interest rates, many smaller landlords will simply sell up rather than spend over £10,000 on each property.”
Ed Miliband has pushed for landlords to meet EPC C targets by 2028 for new tenancies and 2030 for existing ones, yet The Telegraph reports that his own home failed to meet these standards.
According to The Telegraph, an EPC assessment in 2023 on Mr Miliband’s property barely secured a D rating with 57 points. The assessor said the property did have a potential EPC C rating of 74 points.
A year later, after switching from a gas boiler to a heat pump, the home’s carbon emissions dropped from 12 tonnes to 4.5 tonnes, but its energy rating only just improved to a C.
However, the second assessment revealed Mr Miliband’s property recorded floorspace was 252 square metres, 30 square metres smaller than in the previous year’s EPC.
Elmhurst Energy, which carried out the second assessment, said the more recent floor measurement was consistent with a much older EPC assessment carried out in 2009 by the company. A spokesperson told The Telegraph the 2023 assessment was done by a different company.
Tom Garrigan, of the Building Services Research and Information Association, told The Telegraph it was strange why the property’s EPC details changed so much.
He said to The Telegraph: “If you took the address off both certificates, you would have no idea they were the same house.
“It’s difficult to say whether any remedial works have been done, or whether they were able to physically check insulation when they couldn’t before.
“It does beg the question around the policing of EPCs because surely if a house goes from 287 square metres to 225, I would expect something in the EPC to explain why that is.”
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Next Article
Cladding crisis drags on eight years after Grenfell
1 year ago | 17 comments
1 year ago | 8 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 1630 - Articles: 3
9:55 AM, 27th March 2025, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by Desert Rat at 26/03/2025 – 23:26
People will still need to rent, but I’m investing in BTR.
Member Since October 2023 - Comments: 14
9:46 AM, 29th March 2025, About 1 year ago
Most student accommodation includes bills so don’t see how these upgrades would save the tenants money…Just more anti-landlord, pro-renter hot air from Labour!
Member Since October 2022 - Comments: 11
10:19 AM, 31st March 2025, About 1 year ago
The current Epc system is not worth the paper it’s printed on, it is still based on Gas being the cheaper fuel, you cannot fit heat pumps to certain properties due to regulations with regards the installation, solar also does not work on every property it depends on the roof size and direction of the pitch.
I myself own a Victorian House which has been converted into 4 self contained appartments, each apartment has an individual electricity supply, external walls were possible have all been insulated and rendered, insulation exceeds the requirements, it is not possible to fit 4 separate heatpumps due to the proximity of the neighbouring properties or enough solar panels on the north facing roof, the property cannot exceed a D rating due to the fact its only source of energy is electricity,
Currently I have 4 happy long term tennants, the rent is reasonable they all have modern appartments, the property provides me with an income/pension which I worked to build, due to ill health I rely on my rental income support myself and my family, unfortunately because of Millapedes idiotic system I will have to sell my family business make 4 good tenants homeless, give 28% of my gain to Rachel Thieves to waste and fritter away, reducing my investment capital substantially, I am considering using what is left to invest in the commercial market, long lease blue chip, where returns are a lot higher, maintenance costs borne by the tennants, but with Rachael in charge of finnces even that could be high risk as companies and small businesses go to the wall. Hopefully my health will let me live long enough to see the end of this communist dictatorship.
Instead of forcing landlords like me to evict good tenants and sell up, why not let market forces decide if you can rent a D of E rated property surely it should be up to the tenants to decide, obviously lower rents for lower grades which would take into account any extra heating costs.
However common sense it seems is not one of the qualifications to become an MP in government.
Member Since May 2025 - Comments: 74
8:17 AM, 30th May 2025, About 10 months ago
The EPC C only applies to PRIVATE rented properties whilst council and social landlords can get anyway with doing nothing.
So make the government spend £45BILLION upgrading their council stock to meet the same standards as private landlords.
Sign my petition:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/718910
Member Since May 2025 - Comments: 74
8:20 AM, 30th May 2025, About 10 months ago
The EPC C only applies to PRIVATE rented properties whilst council and social landlords can get anyway with doing nothing. Currently they dont even need to achieve C.
It looks like councils are getting fake EPCs a a friends council house was failed by the EPC examiner but somehow eneded up being C yet neighbouring privately owned council houses in the terrace which have insulation, double glazing and combi boiler are D or E?
So make the government spend £45BILLION upgrading their council stock to meet the same standards as private landlords.
Sign my petition:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/718910