Labour deputy leader named among MPs renting out rooms to colleagues

Labour deputy leader named among MPs renting out rooms to colleagues

9:26 AM, 29th October 2025, 6 months ago 11
Categories:

Labour’s new deputy leader is among MPs renting out rooms to colleagues at taxpayers’ expense, new figures reveal.

New figures from the Daily Mail show five landlord MPs pocketed over £30,000 last year by letting properties to colleagues in the House of Commons.

The Parliamentary watchdog had previously pledged to review the practice amid concerns about potential conflicts of interest.

One of these MPs is Lucy Powell, who replaced Angela Rayner as Labour’s Deputy Leader following Rayner’s resignation over stamp duty controversy.

Arrangement saves money claims Lucy Powell

Ms Powell previously told The Big Issue that she was not a landlord, explaining that she has a lodger and shares her flat with another MP.

She has previously declared rental income in the register of interests, but said she earns less than £10,000 and only declares it for transparency.

However, in a new development, Ms Powell has confirmed that she lets a room to a fellow MP, who claims the rent and bills through expenses.

A spokesperson for Ms Powell told The Telegraph that the arrangement saves money because it is below market rent.

The spokesperson told the Telegraph: “In a long-standing arrangement, Lucy pays for all her own London accommodation costs instead of claiming £30,000 a year that she could have for the 13 years she’s been an MP.

“As she has been completely transparent about over the last 10 years, her friend and colleague shares with her as a lodger, contributing for rent and bills via  Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa).

“Again claiming well under the permitted allowance, and an amount independently assessed as value for money. Throughout this time, she has transparently declared this arrangement, despite it being below the threshold to do so.

“Ipsa is responsible for determining whether this represents value for money and transparency for the taxpayer and has consistently done so.”

Malicious intent who wish to cause harm

A decade ago, the Parliamentary watchdog said it would review MPs letting properties to one another due to concerns over potential conflicts of interest.

However, it has continued to permit existing arrangements, provided the landlord MP does not also claim expenses for their own second home.

IPSA has refused to identify the MPs involved, claiming to the Daily Mail: “Due to the low numbers of MPs who are landlords, we believe that disclosing the names would have a substantial likelihood of attracting the interest of those with malicious intent who wish to cause harm.”

The news follows the London Renters Union demand a ban on MPs as landlords after data reveals Labour has the highest number of landlord MPs.

Jae Vail, spokesperson for the London Renters Union, told the i: “Until parliament is free of landlord MPs, renters will not trust the government to deliver the bold action we need. It’s time for the government to ban landlords from parliament and start working for ordinary people, investing in council housing and capping rents.”

However, the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA), defended landlord MPs.

A spokesperson for the NRLA told the i: “Calls for MPs to be totally banned from being landlords are fuelling an unhelpful narrative that providing homes to rent is a bad thing” when demand is outstripping supply.

“Being a landlord is not a bad thing. For MPs, it is vital that when deciding whether to rent out property, they have the time to fully meet the responsibilities of being a landlord.”


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since November 2024 - Comments: 81

    8:32 AM, 29th October 2025, About 6 months ago

    These MPs are a disgrace if you have lodgers you are a landlord.

  • Member Since May 2014 - Comments: 620

    9:22 AM, 29th October 2025, About 6 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by A Reader at 29/10/2025 – 08:32
    I also think that she was one of the Labour MP’s who went on TV defending the other Labour MP Jas Athwal.
    The BBC said that the properties he let had infestations, black mould and were not licensed.
    Apparently he made a mistake!!

  • Member Since January 2024 - Comments: 24

    11:18 AM, 29th October 2025, About 6 months ago

    The dog whistle to the landlord whistle
    In my opinion
    Allegedly
    Free speech dead

  • Member Since June 2015 - Comments: 333

    11:55 AM, 29th October 2025, About 6 months ago

    I don’t understand why having a lodger is seen as a bad thing.
    Everyone has a tax free allowance of £7500 to encourage them to rent out their spare room. Why should an MP be any different?
    Another MP choosing to be a lodger is far cheaper for the tax payer than if they chose to rent a self contained flat.

    If we want the best possible utilisation of a scarce resource (housing) surely this arrangement should be commended and actively encouraged.
    It’s probably about the only positive thing a Labour MP has done since the General Election.

  • Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 1635 - Articles: 3

    12:12 PM, 29th October 2025, About 6 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by A Reader at 08:32

    A resident landlord but without all the hassle facing a ‘real’ landlord. I’m in no way defending MPs, especially the Labour hypocrites, but this is just ‘Rent a Room’, which anyone can do, and receive up to £7,500 tax-free.
    What does peeve me is these MPs are owning larger properties than they need for their Westminster duties, in the centre of London. They will probably have been purchased at the time MPs could have their mortgages paid, and hence they will have purchased properties larger than they needed, and which have now dramatically increased in value, and can ‘profit’ tax-free from having a lodger.

  • Member Since August 2023 - Comments: 71

    12:29 PM, 29th October 2025, About 6 months ago

    If Lucy Powell is renting out a room she is still and landlord, and therefore should be registered as such for tax purposes. There’s no: Ifs and buts, lodger or tenants, helping a colleague or at market rent etc. The tenant renting Lucy’s room is sharing the bills and the tenant is using all the common facilities. She is by definition a landlord. As to whether the sum warmed through being a landlord is below or above the threshold is irrelevant.

  • Member Since May 2016 - Comments: 1570 - Articles: 16

    12:38 PM, 29th October 2025, About 6 months ago

    … not, ” Publishing the names of landlords as it might attract harm. ” ….

    Hmm, isn’t that the reason Private landlords ( which M.P’s are ) object to the Landlord database !
    Hypocrisy alive and well I see.

  • Member Since June 2015 - Comments: 333

    3:58 PM, 29th October 2025, About 6 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Mr Blueberry at 29/10/2025 – 12:29
    If the rent is £625 a month or less it isn’t taxable under the Rent a Room scheme.

    If Lucy Powell is charging rent she is a landlord. It doesn’t matter if the tenant is a lodger or on an AST. They are renting their accommodation.
    There are 2 types of landlord. Live in with very generous tax treatment, or live out who are absolutely hammered with a unique form of taxation that no other industry experiences.

  • Member Since March 2024 - Comments: 5

    2:04 PM, 30th October 2025, About 6 months ago

    Ponzi scheme like net zero and many other establishment schemes using OUR money

  • Member Since March 2024 - Comments: 5

    2:07 PM, 30th October 2025, About 6 months ago

    Do they pay capital gains tax on second home when they sell it or stop being an MP??

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles