Government refuses to set target for affordable homes

Affordable housing target crossed out in front of Parliament, reflecting the government’s lack of a national target.
12:01 AM, 21st August 2026, 3 weeks ago 2

The government has claimed, despite not setting a specific target for the number of affordable homes to be built, it remains committed to “delivering the biggest increase in social and affordable housebuilding in a generation”.

In answer to a written parliamentary question, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Housing Baroness Taylor of Stevenage claimed that the government’s £39 billion Social and Affordable Homes Programme represents the largest investment in social housing ever.

However, the government has refused to set a figure for how many affordable homes it expects to deliver, instead leaving local planning authorities to determine housing need in their areas.

Government has not set an affordable housing target

Baroness Taylor of Stevenage said: “304,165 new affordable homes were delivered between April 2020 and March 2025. The government has not set an affordable housing target to date, but we are committed to delivering the biggest increase in social and affordable housebuilding in a generation.

“National planning policy makes clear that it is for local planning authorities to assess the affordable housing need of their areas, including the need for social rent, and set policies to meet this local need. This includes setting out the proportion and type of affordable housing that should be delivered on new development.

“Our new 10-year, £39 billion Social and Affordable Homes Programme is the largest long-term investment in social and affordable housing in recent memory”.

Slashing affordable housing requirements

The news comes as last year the government announced new emergency measures to tackle London housebuilding targets by slashing affordable housing requirements to 20%.

Despite London Mayor Sadiq Khan pledging to build 88,000 homes a year, data shows only 3,950 new homes were completed in the first half of last year.

Under new powers, Mr Khan will be able to fast-track housing. This will include the ability to review and call in housing schemes of 50 homes or more where boroughs are minded to refuse. City Hall can also become the decision-maker for developments of 1,000sqm or more on green belt land.


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 947

    1:32 PM, 21st August 2026, About 3 weeks ago

    Oddly the affordable homes the builders are being forced to build are not being taken on by housing associations, priced at 80% of other new builds they are still more expensive than second hand homes which do not come with fleece hold charges.

  • Member Since October 2022 - Comments: 261

    11:07 PM, 21st August 2026, About 3 weeks ago

    Ironically, it could be cheaper and quicker to get private investors to service the country’s housing needs and then just pay them a fair price to provide it. The reason being that the required public sector borrowing is replaced by private borrowing, and private landlords have far lower management and maintenance costs than institutional providers. It doesn’t matter how much you hide the real cost with undeclared taxpayer-funded subsidies, we are the cheapest form of provision when all costs are factored in. No wonder institutional investors are so desperate to get rid of us!

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles