2 years ago | 24 comments
Last year saw the highest number of households being evicted due to Section 21 ‘no-fault’ evictions since data collection began in 2018, Generation Rent says.
It is pointing at new government figures for England and says that when the House of Lords debate the Renters (Reform) Bill, protection for tenants from eviction must be strengthened.
The campaign group estimates that abolishing Section 21 last year could have prevented homelessness for 10,000 households that were evicted between April and December 2023 by landlords seeking to re-let properties.
However, the data also shows that 23,000 households faced homelessness during the same period because their landlords wanted to sell.
Under the current Bill, selling the property remains a valid reason for eviction with only two months’ notice provided and no financial support for moving costs.
Generation Rent’s chief executive, Ben Twomey, said: “Abolition of Section 21 evictions has the potential to make a huge difference to renters’ lives and reduce the number of us who have to get our council’s help to avoid homelessness.
“But the government’s current plans will leave tens of thousands of us exposed to homelessness because of the lack of protection when landlords still have a valid reason to evict us, like selling the property.”
He added: “Renters need more time to move than the two months we currently get, and landlords who are uprooting their tenants’ lives should support us with the costs of moving.
“That will both reduce the stress and hardship of an unwanted move and reduce the homelessness epidemic that is currently shredding councils’ finances.”
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
2 years ago | 24 comments
2 years ago | 17 comments
2 years ago | 22 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 1575
4:42 PM, 1st May 2024, About 2 years ago
There are a few reasons that explain the rise in Section 21 Notices.
(1) Section 24. Taxing turnover rather than profit.
(2) Rising interest rates. Landlords are struggling with higher interest rates (exacerbated by Section 24). Higher interest rates also means better investments are available without the stress of tenants, councils and Westminster.
(3) Stagnant or falling house prices. With the prospect of lower prices, landlords need to be more ruthless when it comes to making a profit.
(4) Renters (Reform) Bill. Savvy landlords are exiting the sector ahead of yet more punitive legislation. If they think we have had a flood of Se Timon 21 Notices, prepare for a tsunami of Section 21 Notices this year.
(5) Landlords tend to be older people. Unless the next generation wants to become landlords, we really should consider what we are leaving our children. Mine don’t want property. An y tenant that becomes a burden will be somebody else’s burden soon enough.
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 1999
5:09 PM, 1st May 2024, About 2 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 01/05/2024 – 16:42
I think instead of “ruthless” it is better just to say realistic. As they are unable to deduct their finance costs many landlords have found themselves in a position where they are no longer making a profit after tax, where they are making a loss, or where the profit after tax that they are making is less than if they just stuck the money in premium bonds.
But most landlords want good long-term tenants. It is the government and the Bank of England that have made that activity less attractive and more risky. But in the short period since we have been unable to deduct our finance costs I have seen the agent that I use switch from advising me to keep rents slightly lower than market rent to minimise the risk of void periods to raising rent. The reason for the switch is that as the risk goes up and as landlords face more and more controls the only sensible and reasonable response to mitigating that risk is to push up the rent as high as possible.
There’s nothing ‘ruthless’ about that. It’s the only sensible response to a situation where as a result of government policy you find yourself facing more risk.
Member Since November 2016 - Comments: 227
5:27 PM, 1st May 2024, About 2 years ago
To suggest landlords are evicting tenants so they can relet is laughable.
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 1999
5:59 PM, 1st May 2024, About 2 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Martin Roberts at 01/05/2024 – 17:27
Except that is where landlords have had to evict to make improvements because they believed that they would be unable to rent their properties going forward unless they improved their EPC ratings. In these situations, of course, when the landlord re-lets the property it’s going to be at a higher rent.
But again, tenants don’t benefit from this and it is not landlords that are at fault here: The real reason for the disruption is local and central government meddling in the market and restricting choice so that they can pretend they are doing the right thing whilst they are grandstanding at climate change summits.
Member Since November 2016 - Comments: 227
8:57 PM, 1st May 2024, About 2 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Beaver at 01/05/2024 – 17:59
Absolutely.
Member Since June 2015 - Comments: 330
11:39 PM, 1st May 2024, About 2 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 01/05/2024 – 14:47
But you don’t evict every tenant throughout your period of ownership. Most will leave of their own accord.
You only sell each house once. Some of us have owned some of our houses for over 30 years
Member Since July 2022 - Comments: 23
7:20 PM, 2nd May 2024, About 2 years ago
Don’t you believe it that you will be able to gain possession to sell one minor mistake or not in court will scupper that on advice from G Rent and co look at Scotland they are all effectively sitting tenants
Due to Mandatory to Discretionary change