Open Letter To Grant Shapps and the BBC – Clause 24

Open Letter To Grant Shapps and the BBC – Clause 24

22:17 PM, 22nd January 2016, About 6 years ago 66

Text Size

I’ve shared this email to my MP, Grant Shapps, on another thread where a prominent poster has suggested that I post it on a new discussion. Open Letter To Grant Shapps and the BBC - Clause 24

I emailed Grant Shapps on 7th January 2016. He acknowledged, but I received no further reply. I emailed him yesterday morning giving him the chance to reply, and informed him that I would be sending it to the BBC today (22/01/16).

“Dear Grant

I voted Tory at the last election. I’ve always considered myself a classic Tory voter, although I have voted for other parties in two elections: Blair, unfortunately wooed me first time round, and the coalition was partly down to me. Other than that, I’ve always voted Tory.

I’ve always found politics a pretty frustrating field where anyone can promise what they want and do something else and not be held to account. A manifesto can only be relied upon as a hugely inflated list of things a party will dream up in order to attract voters. Why on earth we haven’t a system in place which renders a manifesto something like a contractual offer where there are penalties if promises are broken is beyond me. It’s no wonder the electorate is so utterly fed-up with politicians and all parties. Nothing a politician or party says can be relied upon, which makes a mockery of democracy. I choose who to vote for based on what they tell me they stand for and what is written in their manifesto.

Since the last election, I have regretted my vote more than at any other time in my life, for both local and national elections. I took time to read the summary manifestos for the three parties I would consider voting for so that I could make the best choice for me, my family and the nation. No one party was going to offer everything to suit me, but as usual, the Tories were going to allow me to continue to work hard, invest in property for my future pension provisions as a sideline, and would probably handle the economy better than any other party.

The first decision George Osborne made which angered me was the abolition of tax credits for working people. I don’t get tax credits, despite being a single parent due to me just about breaking into the 40% tax bracket, but one thing I’m very happy for my taxes to be spent on is help for those who strive to work to make ends meet rather than staying on full welfare. I cannot for the life of me work out how this was ever considered by the Tory party. Aren’t you supposed to be encouraging people back to work? The most sickening part was the disingenuous clap-trap being spouted by GO and the party of how this would be set-off against increases in minimum wage. Many of these people were struggling anyway, how one earth would an immediate cut in tax credits be alleviated by increase in minimum wage in a few years? How many people on tax credits are above the minimum wage anyway?

The welfare slashes to the Disabled and Elderly are sickening. I don’t know enough about these to comment.

As mentioned, I’m a single parent with a job. Since I don’t have a pension, 4 years ago I entered into property investment via let-to-buy and downgrading my living arrangements. The following year I moved again, and let out a second home. This has stretched me financially, but no more than I had planned and it is all part of my strategy to provide for myself in the future, and my son through university.

I have excellent tenants in both properties. One family have been with me for just over two years. They are in their 50s and their grown up son lives with them. They have good jobs – she is a nurse, he is a plumber. I believe the son is an electrician. They moved into my house after having their home repossessed. I was extremely nervous about taking them on, but luckily, it has proved to be a very good decision. They love their home, and I’m very happy to have them looking after it. I have not increased their rent since they’ve been here as I had no reason to do so. My costs hadn’t increased significantly, and a good tenant is worth looking after and hanging on to. Unfortunately, due to the tax changes being brought in, I will be notifying them of a rent rise this month, which will reflect rent rises by corporate LLs in the area, approximately 10% for the period. In the notice of rent rise, I will be explaining exactly why I’m doing this. Every single LL I know will be doing the same. With just two properties, since I am in the 40% tax band, and I will now be paying tax on £19K on mortgages per year, I will have to keep rents bang up to the maximum the market permits. Since demand for rental is so high, and my properties are lovely, I foresee no problems with retaining or replacing tenants if they chose to move due to rent rises.

My second tenants are new to me since August. They seem lovely, and were desperate to move into my home and I was delighted they cleared all the checks and referencing. They were worried as they had some concern about their credit history due to some missed CC payments. I don’t know why they choose to rent, but they were at their last rented property for 23 years, and only chose to move as the LL was selling. They have good jobs – she works in a hospice, and he is a football scout. I had no intention of increasing their rent as I want them to stay with me as long as possible, but I will now be increasing rents annually in accordance with the Housing Act.

Do you think either of my tenants could secure mortgages if they wanted to?

I hope I will be able to make the finances work after clause 24 through rent increases, and possible remortgaging (I certainly can’t work any harder), but if not then I will need to evict my tenants and sell my properties. That’s two families evicted and me with no pension provision for the future. That really was not what I expected as the outcome of me voting Tory.

I know directly, and indirectly through social media, hundreds of LLs, and we are all good LLs, intent on looking after our tenants, complying with continual changes in legislation, and paying our taxes on income (profit) fairly.

No LL I know understands the logic behind C24. What particularly puzzles me is that Tories traditionally support those who want to work hard and provide for themselves, as well as encouraging entrepreneurialism. After all, we all know that stimulating the micro economy boosts the macro economy.

But what sickens me (and I’m not overemphasising that) is the absolute discrimination in favour of the wealthy elite and large corporations. This is what the Tories now stand for! Corporations are exempt from the policy as are those with more than 15 properties! I’m speechless! What formula was used to calculate the 15 property exemption number? Is that the minimum number of properties the average Tory MP owns? Certainly Osborne and his family who have benefitted very well in their property investments from some Maverick tax avoidance.

In summary, I’d like to point out, through my experience and knowledge of the sector, the effects of c24:

  1. Rents WILL rise. The RICS estimates by 25% by 2020. I think that’s a fair average. Many LLs like myself with good tenants may introduce higher rent rises than that to catch up with the market.
  2. Tenants will be evicted as some LLs will sell some properties. This may be simply because they choose to get out of the game since it is no longer profitable, or because being taxed on turnover will actually push them into a deficit. These LLs were operating on tight margins anyway, and interest rises may have eventually hit them, but it’s still stress and upheaval for tenants.
  3. Corporations will buy up rental stock sold off from the PRS. Corporate LLs will absolutely maximise profits and increase rents as much as the market permits.
  4. Hundreds of thousands of PAYE workers like me will chose to opt out of the market as it is no longer a viable pension investment option. That means hundreds of thousands of people without pension provisions in the future. Further pressure on that deafeningly loud tick of the pension time bomb that this country will very soon be unable to ignore, like your government is doing.
  5.  There will be NO increase in housing stock. But there will be a further shortage of housing for families like my tenants who cannot buy as they are unable to secure mortgages. What is to happen to them? Temporary accommodation or LA social housing? We don’t have enough of that, and the council certainly couldn’t afford it. There will be a catastrophic effect on the social housing sector directly as a result of this policy and its decimation of the private rental sector. 
  6. The loss of the next election for Tories. Unless there are fundamental changes, and a return to the core values and policies of the Tory party, I will not be voting for you again. Of the estimated 3m LLs in this country, I’d say a good 50% of them must be straight forward Tory voters. Not anymore. The LL community it absolutely outraged at clause 24. Many many have said that they will never vote Tory again. I chose Tory last time as they offered the best for me and the nation; now you attack everyone including the poor, the sick, the elderly and middle income core Tories like me. The only people the Tories look after are the extremely wealthy and big business. The Bullingdon Club Party.

I understand the need to steady the housing market, and make it easier, or even possible for first time buyers to get onto the housing ladder, but clause 24 is not going to do either. It’s so badly thought out, in fact, I struggle to believe it was thought through at all. The only benefit it will bring is to the wealthy elite and big corporations due to the competitive advantage it will give them through tax advantages over the little players like me.

Yours sincerely,

Rachel Hodge
ex-Tory voter”



Comments

by

21:26 PM, 30th January 2016, About 6 years ago

Completely inaccurate article, the possible 15 properties rule (yet to be confirmed) relates to stamp duty not clause 24!

by Rachel Hodge

20:53 PM, 31st January 2016, About 6 years ago

Here we go. Email just issued to one of my two tenants. Didn't feel good at all; quite emotional really.

Dear M****

I’m very happy to have you as my tenants, you are a pleasure to deal with, and I hope you’re going to stay with me a long time.

I had no plans to raise rents at all, unless my costs increased significantly. However, with the changes brought in with the finance bill by George Osborne last Autumn, my costs are about to increase more than significantly over the next 4 years.

I have written to my MP (Grant Shapps), and the BBC, I have joined and donated to a campaign for a judicial review, but I’m unfortunatley now going to have to raise your rent, and I’m not at all happy about having to do that. I have made it clear to my MP that the only reason I’m having to raise the rent is because of the finance bill. I wrote to him on 7th January, and have not yet received a reply. Myself and hundreds of other LLs are in the same situation, and we are trying our best to change this. I want to change it as I want to get back to my original plan which is not to raise the rent if I have a really good tenant, which I have.

I’ve reviewed rents in the area, and they have gone up by an average of between 10-15% in the period. I don’t want to impose that sort of rent rise, and think that a £100 per month rent rise should be acceptable. Please could you let me have your thoughts on this before I issue the official paperwork. The notice would be for the rent increase in a couple of months, so beginning of April.

Once again, I wouldn’t have wanted to raise your rent, but for this tax change, where I really don’t have a choice.

Please give me a call if you have any queries, or let me know you’re happy for me to send you the notification for the rent rise.

Best wishes,
Rachel

by Luke P

22:14 PM, 31st January 2016, About 6 years ago

My letters have now started to go out to some 350 tenants. Collectively this will start to have an impact.

by Rachel Hodge

22:24 PM, 31st January 2016, About 6 years ago

Probably not as personal or worrying for you then perhaps Luke with 350 tenants?

My tenant answered more or less immediately that they are stretched to maximum, so couldn't afford anymore. A few emails back and forth and we've agreed that I'll let them look for a property for a month or so and they'll let me know when they've found one and I will then issue their notice and then advertise the property.

I've had a look and they are well under the going rent for the area. They will either have to downgrade or increase their rent.

by James Fraser

22:27 PM, 31st January 2016, About 6 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Luke P" at "31/01/2016 - 22:14":

Funny you should all say that now guys - I've just spent much of Friday and today issuing similar kindly explanatory letters and the Form 4s to raise rents by £100/month (still way below full market value). I have hated doing it and Im sure there'll be complaints. Luckily for me, two of my favourite tenants who I can't bear to issue rises to have, coincidentally and without forewarning, both given me notice this week which is a great relief as I don't now have to raise their rents, but can find new people at more realistic rates.

It's a crap situation all round. I've truly agonised over this, yet all we hear in the media is what uncaring selfish scum we are! Oh, right, of course - funny, it really doesn't feel like that!

by

22:58 PM, 31st January 2016, About 6 years ago

Why such a rush to increase rents when the tax situation is not fully implemented until 2020?

by James Fraser

23:09 PM, 31st January 2016, About 6 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Simon Salter" at "31/01/2016 - 22:58":

Are you serious? Firstly, my already considerable tax bill goes up around £8,000 this year as WT goes. Secondly, with much higher and potentially infinite rates of tax starting from next April, any decent business is going to be taking steps in advance of this to bolster reserves and protect itself. But thirdly, if rents have been up to 25% below market value for up to 10 years, any future rise in rents from more natural causes has got to be accounted for now or future rises could be unfeasibly high. Any landlords not preparing themselves and their tenants for the uncomfortable ride ahead are possibly in for a shock further on.

by Rachel Hodge

23:18 PM, 31st January 2016, About 6 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Simon Salter" at "31/01/2016 - 22:58":

My tax bill will increase significantly from 2017.

I certainly don't expect to get away with a 30-40% annual rent increase then, so I have decided, somewhat prudently, if I say so myself, to introduce incremental rent increases from now until then.

by James Fraser

23:30 PM, 31st January 2016, About 6 years ago

Absolutely right too, which is why so many other landlords are taking what steps they can now. As the pressures increase over the next 4 years it may not be possible to keep pace with the rapacious tax changes so a smoother and more even rise now is the only option left.

I'm certainly explaining to my tenants exactly how these rises are being caused. In great detail too!

by

23:44 PM, 31st January 2016, About 6 years ago

May be wishful thinking on my part but what happens if it doesn't go ahead? You could have lost a very good tenant for nothing. Lots of legal action being taken against the proposals. Will be interesting to see what the March budget brings us!


Leave Comments

Please Log-In OR Become a member to reply to comments or subscribe to new comment notifications.

Forgotten your password?

BECOME A MEMBER