Reply to the comment left by Tim A at 28/03/2022 - 14:28the case you cite is completely different wording and the tenant won! so I wouldnt worry. if firstport or e&m try it on, then go to tribunal.
I dont see a problem with this clause. seems clear that the original ground rent will go up at same percentage as original valuation at each review. btw is this a barratts/ peverel lease? is it the total of all...
Reply to the comment left by "Howard Reuben" at "07/02/2016 - 20:17": WELL, YOU WOULD SAY THAT WOULDNT YOU... A BROKER HAS THE SAME DUTY OF CARE AND DUE DILIGENCE WHETHER THEY CHARGE THE BORROWER A FEE OR NOT. BROKERS...
I WOULDNT USE A BROKER FOR SUCH A SMALL LOAN UNLESS THEY DONT CHARGE THE APPLICANT A FEE. I THINK MOST LENDERS WONT LEND ON LOW VALUE PROPERTIES SUCH AS THIS, BUT YOU WILL NEED TO CHECK.
Reply to the comment left by "Mandy Thomson" at "15/01/2016 - 18:17": mandy, i dont think i implied that recorded delivery was not 'legal'! the point i was making (and you have confirmed) is obviously the advice given by ross...
Reply to the comment left by "Ross McColl" at "15/01/2016 - 12:25": 'Make sure you record delivery of the notices.' I THOUGHT THE LEGAL ADVICE IS NOT TO DO RECORDED DELIVERY, BUT A CERTIFICATE OF POSTING.
I THINK YOUVE BEEN MISLED. THE HMRC DEADLINE FOR PAYING SDLT IS UNCONNECTED AT PRESENT TO LR REGISTRATION AND CANT SEE THAT IT WOULD BE PRACTICAL OR FAIR FOR SUCH A CHANGE.
Reply to the comment left by "Daniel 54" at "11/01/2016 - 16:59": Section 11.(6) applies only for the purpose of inspection and repair NOT QUITE (SEE BELOW) BUT THAT CAN COVER MOST SITUATIONS. Furthermore there is a view that the...
Reply to the comment left by "Anon Landlord" at "11/01/2016 - 16:06": MAY BE YOUR RIGHT. POSS THEY KEEP THE PCB FOR SCRAP VALUE. I ALWAYS ATTEND CP12'S SO MAYBE THATS WHY I HAVENT BEEN A VICTIM.
landlord dont need tenants permission. all that is required is 24 hours notice (landlord and tenant act 1985 in case anyone wants to disagree). obviously if no notice given then that is wrong but if you havent suffered a loss...
Reply to the comment left by "Anon Landlord" at "11/01/2016 - 13:57": 'Second thought, when I call engineers, I sometimes wonder if they are taking away working parts and fitting in faulty / intermittent parts which they have taken from...
Reply to the comment left by "Graham Chilvers" at "11/01/2016 - 09:07": i like your thinking but the actual amount of increased tax payable will be a lot more than 5% for most landlords as the effect will be to...
assuming all the above is evidenced then yes there is a good claim for damages. you have a contract with the agent, the agent made a negligent or fraudulent misstatement upon which you acted and you potentially suffered a loss....
Reply to the comment left by "Ellen McInnes" at "05/01/2016 - 23:24": AS USUAL THE SO CALLED EXPERTS WERE WRONG. SEE: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/cy/uksi/1994/133/made THIS IS A USEFUL GUIDE RE COMPENSATION AND WHEN IT RUNS FROM, ALBEIT THAT THESE PROVISIONS ONLY APPLY...
Reply to the comment left by "Annie Landlord" at "05/01/2016 - 21:12": 'rang BG and then tried to tell me that BG said they knew what the problem was, could come straight away and carried the requisite parts.' IN MY...
That sounds great. but about 12 yrs ago i utilised the homeserve policy we had taken out for a combi. the engineers visited (not quickly) and basically seemed to guess what part needed replacing. they would then order the part...
Reply to comment left by Tim Andrew at 28/03/2022 - 14:28
Reply to the comment left by Tim A at 28/03/2022 - 14:28the case you cite is completely different wording and the tenant won! so I wouldnt worry. if firstport or e&m try it on, then go to tribunal.
Read More →28th March 2022, 4 years ago
I dont see a problem with this clause. seems clear that the original ground rent will go up at same percentage as original valuation at each review. btw is this a barratts/ peverel lease? is it the total of all...
Read More →Reply to comment left by Howard Reuben at 07/02/2016 - 20:17
Reply to the comment left by "Howard Reuben" at "07/02/2016 - 20:17": WELL, YOU WOULD SAY THAT WOULDNT YOU... A BROKER HAS THE SAME DUTY OF CARE AND DUE DILIGENCE WHETHER THEY CHARGE THE BORROWER A FEE OR NOT. BROKERS...
Read More →6th February 2016, 10 years ago
I WOULDNT USE A BROKER FOR SUCH A SMALL LOAN UNLESS THEY DONT CHARGE THE APPLICANT A FEE. I THINK MOST LENDERS WONT LEND ON LOW VALUE PROPERTIES SUCH AS THIS, BUT YOU WILL NEED TO CHECK.
Read More →Reply to comment left by Paul Tarry at 14/01/2016 - 21:02
Reply to the comment left by "Paul Tarry" at "14/01/2016 - 21:02": HI PAUL what system did you install?
Read More →Reply to comment left by Mandy Thomson at 15/01/2016 - 18:17
Reply to the comment left by "Mandy Thomson" at "15/01/2016 - 18:17": mandy, i dont think i implied that recorded delivery was not 'legal'! the point i was making (and you have confirmed) is obviously the advice given by ross...
Read More →Reply to comment left by Ross McColl at 15/01/2016 - 12:25
Reply to the comment left by "Ross McColl" at "15/01/2016 - 12:25": 'Make sure you record delivery of the notices.' I THOUGHT THE LEGAL ADVICE IS NOT TO DO RECORDED DELIVERY, BUT A CERTIFICATE OF POSTING.
Read More →15th January 2016, 10 years ago
THIS IS ALL BULLS*** BASED ON NOTHING...
Read More →14th January 2016, 10 years ago
I THINK YOUVE BEEN MISLED. THE HMRC DEADLINE FOR PAYING SDLT IS UNCONNECTED AT PRESENT TO LR REGISTRATION AND CANT SEE THAT IT WOULD BE PRACTICAL OR FAIR FOR SUCH A CHANGE.
Read More →Reply to comment left by Daniel 54 at 11/01/2016 - 16:59
Reply to the comment left by "Daniel 54" at "11/01/2016 - 16:59": Section 11.(6) applies only for the purpose of inspection and repair NOT QUITE (SEE BELOW) BUT THAT CAN COVER MOST SITUATIONS. Furthermore there is a view that the...
Read More →Reply to comment left by Anon Landlord at 11/01/2016 - 16:06
Reply to the comment left by "Anon Landlord" at "11/01/2016 - 16:06": MAY BE YOUR RIGHT. POSS THEY KEEP THE PCB FOR SCRAP VALUE. I ALWAYS ATTEND CP12'S SO MAYBE THATS WHY I HAVENT BEEN A VICTIM.
Read More →11th January 2016, 10 years ago
landlord dont need tenants permission. all that is required is 24 hours notice (landlord and tenant act 1985 in case anyone wants to disagree). obviously if no notice given then that is wrong but if you havent suffered a loss...
Read More →Reply to comment left by Anon Landlord at 11/01/2016 - 13:57
Reply to the comment left by "Anon Landlord" at "11/01/2016 - 13:57": 'Second thought, when I call engineers, I sometimes wonder if they are taking away working parts and fitting in faulty / intermittent parts which they have taken from...
Read More →Reply to comment left by Graham Chilvers at 11/01/2016 - 09:07
Reply to the comment left by "Graham Chilvers" at "11/01/2016 - 09:07": i like your thinking but the actual amount of increased tax payable will be a lot more than 5% for most landlords as the effect will be to...
Read More →7th January 2016, 10 years ago
assuming all the above is evidenced then yes there is a good claim for damages. you have a contract with the agent, the agent made a negligent or fraudulent misstatement upon which you acted and you potentially suffered a loss....
Read More →6th January 2016, 10 years ago
I would say it is important to increase rents to market levels not just because of clause 24 but the likely rent control which IMO is next.
Read More →Reply to comment left by Ellen McInnes at 05/01/2016 - 23:24
Reply to the comment left by "Ellen McInnes" at "05/01/2016 - 23:24": AS USUAL THE SO CALLED EXPERTS WERE WRONG. SEE: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/cy/uksi/1994/133/made THIS IS A USEFUL GUIDE RE COMPENSATION AND WHEN IT RUNS FROM, ALBEIT THAT THESE PROVISIONS ONLY APPLY...
Read More →Reply to comment left by Annie Landlord at 05/01/2016 - 21:12
Reply to the comment left by "Annie Landlord" at "05/01/2016 - 21:12": 'rang BG and then tried to tell me that BG said they knew what the problem was, could come straight away and carried the requisite parts.' IN MY...
Read More →Reply to comment left by Mandy Thomson at 05/01/2016 - 19:43
Reply to the comment left by "Mandy Thomson" at "05/01/2016 - 19:43": just googled it and its from £79 (30 mins max).
Read More →5th January 2016, 10 years ago
That sounds great. but about 12 yrs ago i utilised the homeserve policy we had taken out for a combi. the engineers visited (not quickly) and basically seemed to guess what part needed replacing. they would then order the part...
Read More →Showing 20 of 646 comments