Andy Burnham faces landlord hypocrisy row over London flat

Andy Burnham faces landlord hypocrisy row over London flat

Andy Burnham faces landlord hypocrisy row over London flat
10:06 AM, 26th May 2026, 3 hours ago 2

Labour Party leader hopeful Andy Burnham has been accused of hypocrisy over reports that he lets a London flat that was partly bought with MPs’ expenses cash.

The Makerfield by-election candidate bought the two-bedroom former council flat in Kennington in 2005, according to The Sun on Sunday.

It reports that its value has since doubled to £480,000.

The claim emerged days after the Greater Manchester Mayor called for tougher action against landlords who fail to bring homes up to a decent standard.

Good Landlord Charter

Speaking on the Social Housing Podcast, Mr Burnham said such properties should be bought through compulsory purchase orders.

He has also launched the Good Landlord Charter as mayor, with the scheme now covering 50% of rented homes in Greater Manchester.

The newspaper reported that mortgage interest on Mr Burnham’s London rental property had previously been paid through his MP’s expenses.

That was before the practice was stopped following the 2009 expenses scandal.

‘Whiff of hypocrisy’

Kevin Hollinrake, the Conservative Party chairman, told The Sun on Sunday: “The self-styled King of the North, it turns out, has kept a rather comfortable foothold south of the river.

“Bought thanks to expenses, doubled in value, rented out for profit – despite cries of unfairness against the landlord class he is a part of.”

He added: “There is a certain whiff of hypocrisy.”

The financial arrangement has attracted criticism before.

In 2015, it was reported that Mr Burnham, then shadow health secretary, was letting the Kennington flat while claiming about £17,000 a year in expenses to rent another property nearby.

At the time, that arrangement was within the rules, although he was accused at the time of showing a ‘lack of judgement’.

Mr Burnham’s spokesman has declined to comment.


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 820

    11:29 AM, 26th May 2026, About 1 hour ago

    I am sure there was something about one rule for them and a different rule for everyone else.
    Everyone is equal, but some are more equal than others.

  • Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 9

    12:24 PM, 26th May 2026, About 14 minutes ago

    If it was bought using expenses, then wasn’t that his own money that he used for Govt. business and then claimed back?
    If it’s doubled in value then surely that’s just good fortune.
    If it’s rented out for profit, it’s surely no different to a car rental company renting cars out for profit?
    And was he supposed to evict his tenant when he became an MP and needed London accomodation? Surely that would have attracted even more criticism.
    I’m not a fan of MP’s hugh salaries and expenses, but just trying to see the argument from both sides.

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles