2 months ago | 2 comments
Nearly 9.5 million energy-efficient homes are projected to face flooding or subsidence risk by 2055, an analysis reveals.
Property data firm TwentyCi found that homes with stronger EPC ratings appear more exposed to long-term environmental risks than less efficient stock.
It says that 37% of homes sit at EPC D, with a further 35% at C.
Set against environmental risk indicators, however, higher-rated properties show greater exposure to both flooding and ground instability.
The firm’s chief executive, Colin Bradshaw, said: “While energy performance certificate (EPC) ratings remain a critical tool in assessing mortgage suitability, analysis of UK residential property data shows they do not reliably indicate exposure to key environmental risks such as flooding and ground instability.
“In fact, some of the UK’s most energy-efficient homes are also among the most vulnerable to flooding and subsidence.”
He added: “For lenders, that creates a potential blind spot in portfolio risk.
“To build truly resilient mortgage books, lenders need to assess energy efficiency alongside a broader range of environmental risk factors.”
Flood risk is highest among EPC G-rated homes, where 5.65% are already classed as high risk, rising to 6.94% by 2055.
B-rated homes follow closely and 5.27% are currently high risk, increasing to 6.52%, which is equivalent to more than two million properties.
The firm says that homes rated A to C show higher exposure to flood risk than those in bands D to G.
Mr Bradshaw said: “As climate pressures intensify, the data underscores the need for a more holistic approach to mortgage underwriting.
“Relying solely on EPC ratings could leave lenders exposed to hidden risks, particularly within segments of the housing market traditionally considered ‘safe’.”
There also appears to be an issue when looking at subsidence risk with B-rated homes ranking highest, with 6.74% currently exposed.
That figure is projected to reach 23.29% by 2055, affecting an estimated 7.4 million homes.
Across the bands, the same pattern holds with higher EPC-rated properties show greater exposure to subsidence than less efficient homes.
Coastal erosion risk shows a different risk level with G-rated homes being most exposed at 0.09%, followed by F-rated properties at 0.04%.
While the numbers are smaller, the impact is often total loss, the firm warns.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Renters' Rights Act enforcement split into breaches and offencesNext Article
UK house prices rise in March - Nationwide
2 months ago | 2 comments
3 months ago | 13 comments
3 months ago | 39 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2197 - Articles: 2
11:14 AM, 1st April 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Nice to see the correlation between high EPC rating and flood risk. I wonder if there is any correlation between EPC’s and risk of earthquakes?
Gross misuse of statistics.
Member Since March 2025 - Comments: 6
11:42 AM, 1st April 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by The_Maluka at 01/04/2026 – 11:14
Perhaps it is because large numbers of “modern”, hence more energy efficient, buildings are built on flood plains because its nice and flat?
Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2197 - Articles: 2
11:55 AM, 1st April 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by Justin Waite at 01/04/2026 – 11:42
Your reasoning confirms my favourite quotation about statistics.
“Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital.” Aaron Levenstein
Member Since March 2025 - Comments: 6
12:27 PM, 1st April 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by The_Maluka at 01/04/2026 – 11:55
Or “Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics!”;-)