2 months ago | 1 comments
Landlords who defer repairs or step back from day-to-day management risk shaving tens of thousands of pounds off the value of their investments over a decade.
According to property management experts Rushbrook & Rathbone, failing to maintain an asset could see a landlord in England losing up to £36,429 over 10 years.
That bill soars to £75,000 for London’s landlords.
The firm’s managing director, Roma Sharma, said: “Property is a long-term investment, but it’s one that requires consistent care and attention in order to perform at its best.
“Of course, it’s understandable that maintenance and management can sometimes be overlooked due to the cost involved, particularly as landlord profit margins have come under increasing pressure due to ongoing legislative changes.”
She added: “This is particularly true at present, with many landlords now facing further investment requirements to ensure their properties meet the evolving standards set by the Renters’ Rights Act, particularly the Decent Homes Standard.”
The firm modelled the effect of a property slipping into poor or unmaintained condition over an average 10-year ownership period.
It assumes a reduction in value of between 10% and 15%, applied to current regional rented home estimates.
At a national average value of £242,857, that percentage drop translates to between £24,286 and £36,429 per property when an owner comes to refinance or exit.
In London, the average rental property costs £500,000 so a 15% decline would remove £75,000 from the eventual sale price.
In the South West, landlords could see up to £52,381 being eroded through lack of upkeep.
That compares with £39,286 in the West Midlands and £35,000 in the South East.
The North East records a potential £28,481 reduction over 10 years, while Yorkshire and the Humber show £25,000 under the same calculation.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Insurance with flood cover for landlords
2 months ago | 1 comments
2 months ago | 1 comments
2 months ago | 1 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since June 2013 - Comments: 3249 - Articles: 81
1:25 PM, 5th March 2026, About 2 months ago
That’s what’s happened to me. Letting the tenant pay 3k pa below market rent. They don’t ask for ote and I ain’t doing ote (except safety standards) at that cheap rent.
Backfires on me, as 20 years later, get the house back a sxxthole that needs 30k spending on. And not had the rent in to pay for it.
Member Since August 2025 - Comments: 41
2:47 AM, 7th March 2026, About 2 months ago
We canot understand why making landlord’s suffer ,what is the achievement of law where landlords kept the rents down to give someone a roof over thier head and then the law says landlord has to pay for update . What would happen to the tenant? dole queue and who has to pay ? Why there cannot be balance to asses the good side side of landlords and assist with some kind of grant to update time will tell when there will be so many renters who will have difficulty finding a place to rent due to lack of houses available . This RRB law had made a mockery of law by painting a picture of all landlords are bad and all tenants are good . We had spent over 17k to update property only to find the tenant moved in ,never hoovered,never cleaned,windows and skirting all turned mouldy with built up of dust/dirt,garden over grown,cans of bear left indoor for weeks ,yet the tenant was busy playing games on computer. Is this what the law has come to to make good landlords whom worked seven days a week because they lived building thier life for progress and family and then this RRB comes in to give green flags to tenants only?
Joe