Labour-run council hires extra staff for selective licensing crackdown

Labour-run council hires extra staff for selective licensing crackdown

Wooden figures symbolising private renters with selective licensing text above
12:01 AM, 17th February 2026, 2 months ago 3

A council has doubled the size of its staff to deal with selective licensing.

Westminster council claims it has recruited 52 new posts to its Private Renters Team to process selective licensing applications and move from “reactive enforcement to a more proactive approach”.

The licence costs nearly £1,000, and an online reporting tool has been launched for residents who suspect a property is operating without the correct licence.

The news follows an announcement by Mansfield District Council recently that it had underestimated how many PRS homes would need to be licensing and recruited two more staff members.

Deliver real change in the private rented sector

The Labour-run council says the response to the selective licensing scheme from landlords “has been far stronger than anticipated” and has received more applications than expected.

Cllr Ellie Ormsby, cabinet member for regeneration and renters, claimed extra staff will help support renters.

She said: “Selective licensing has given us the ability to significantly expand our Private Renters Team, allowing us to move from reactive enforcement to a proactive approach that raises standards across Westminster.

“As new duties come into force under the Renters’ Rights Act, Westminster Labour is making sure the council has the capacity to meet its responsibilities, protect renters, and support responsible landlords. This expanded team gives us the tools we need to deliver real change in the private rented sector.”

Help target enforcement

Westminster City Council claims its Private Renters Team will now focus on increasing compliance across the borough by identifying properties that are not registered but should be licensed under the selective licensing scheme.

The council’s online reporting tool will allow tenants and residents to report a property they suspect has no licence. It claims: “This will help us target enforcement more effectively and ensure that no one gains an unfair advantage by avoiding their responsibilities.”

The council also points out that when a landlord fails to obtain the correct licence, tenants may be eligible to apply for a Rent Repayment Order, allowing them to reclaim up to 12 months’ rent paid during periods of non-compliance.

As previously reported on Property118, selective licensing does more than good, with government guidance suggesting selective licensing should only be used as a last resort.


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since January 2025 - Comments: 57

    6:45 AM, 17th February 2026, About 2 months ago

    Can any council hire more people to fill in the potholes?

    It’s literally like some roads have been carpet bombed

  • Member Since May 2017 - Comments: 765

    4:03 PM, 17th February 2026, About 2 months ago

    Isn’t it lovely to see Labour coming up with a plan to reduce its awful unemployment figures

  • Member Since August 2021 - Comments: 307 - Articles: 1

    9:26 PM, 17th February 2026, About 2 months ago

    Westminster have announced they are not increasing their element of council tax. Local elections in May – couldn’t be any connection.

    They have a poor record of engagement with the PRS, paying lip service to LLAS and the event listed is the only one I recall ever seeing on their site (held just before they layered up on additional and mandatory licensing by implementing selective licensing in most wards last November)

    https://www.westminster.gov.uk/housing/private-sector-housing/landlords/landlord-forums-and-accreditation

    This lack of balance is outrageous.

    Why would the new scheme require 52 additional staff, when they already have systems in place for mandatory and additional licensing?
    What are these posts?
    Why are they not investing in AI tools to identify rogue operators?
    Is this temporary to compensate for the fact that they are still struggling to return to normal service after cyber attack?

    What I do know is I have struggled for many years to get them to carry out proper repairs on two properties where they are the freeholder.

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles