3 months ago | 1 comments
A council has admitted it underestimated how many privately rented homes would need a licence under its new selective licensing scheme, forcing it to recruit two more staff members.
The authority introduced selective licensing across five areas of its district last September, originally estimating that 1,221 homes would fall within the scheme.
That figure was drawn from the most recent English House Survey but just two weeks after applications opened, 1,100 licence submissions were received.
Now Mansfield District Council says that a further 600 rented homes were not included in the original estimate, which significantly expands the amount of enforcement work required.
This week, a report from the council’s private sector housing manager reveals that the license demand means that more staff are needed need ‘to adequately enforce the selective licensing requirements and conditions’.
Once approval is given, another selective licensing compliance officer starting on £43,467 and rising to £50,127 in the fifth year of the scheme.
An extra selective licensing administration support officer to help support delivery across affected wards will earn £33,356, rising to £38,660.
With Mansfield’s licence fee costing £800, the extra 600 properties are expected to generate £480,000 over the five-year life of the scheme.
The council says this income will be sufficient to cover the cost of the two new posts, although it stressed that the figures are estimates and ‘not guaranteed’.
Council officers have begun cross-referencing council tax and Land Registry records to identify unlicensed properties and take enforcement action where necessary.
Landlords who fail to licence a property can face civil penalties of up to £30,000 issued by the council or prosecution in the courts, where fines are unlimited.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Next Article
Landlords: Should I stay or should I sell?
3 months ago | 1 comments
3 months ago
4 months ago | 8 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since May 2025 - Comments: 75
12:51 AM, 17th January 2026, About 3 months ago
600 properties 2 inspections per year so 1,200 per year.
Assume 1 hour per inspection and 30 mins travel time and 30 mins to write up the finding.
Assume 220 working days per year so 440.
So 2.7 inspection per working day so 5.4 hours work per day. As council staff are lazy and unproductive this is probably correct and do nothing for the remaining 2.6 hours per day.
I think the real reason is the council are not allowed to make a profit from selective licensing and therefore need to increase the costs to the landlord fees available rather than reduce the fee per landlord.
I have the financial breakdown of costs from Great Yarmouth so will look at who is charging more/less and who is more productive…
Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 781
12:51 PM, 17th January 2026, About 3 months ago
I wonder how many local landlords are earning this level of income – my guess is very very few.
Member Since November 2014 - Comments: 2
3:24 PM, 18th January 2026, About 3 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Suspicious Steve at 17/01/2026 – 00:51
I’ve had 10 years of selective licencing which accounts for 2 periods, each property was only inspected once in each period, by my calcs that’s 2 property inspections per week, not per day.
I might apply for that job, Mansfield isn’t that far away and I can work a couple of hours a week for almost 1k a week.