8 months ago | 6 comments
A London council has announced a new selective licensing scheme has come into force this week and will set landlords out of pocket by nearly £1,000.
Lambeth Council has announced the selective licensing scheme is in operation across 23 of Lambeth’s 25 electoral wards, which the council claims is to “tackle anti-social behaviour.”
Under the scheme, landlords will need to pay £923 for the licence or face a fine of up to £30,000.
According to Lambeth council, the selective licensing scheme now means landlords will now need to have a licence to legally let to a single-family household or no more than two unrelated sharers, in every part of Lambeth apart from the Vauxhall and Waterloo and South Bank wards.
Cabinet Member for Safer Communities, Councillor Mahamed Hashi, claims the scheme will tackle anti-social behaviour and help tenants.
He said: “For too long, nearly 100,000 private renters in Lambeth have been let down by rogue landlords, left in damp, cold and unsafe flats, unsuitable for families and young people.
“But, from September, we’re changing that with our new licensing scheme – raising housing standards, tackling anti-social behaviour and reducing overcrowding.
“This gives you more security, more rights, and more power to demand the decent homes you deserve.”
The council warn landlords could face a hefty fine of up to £30,000 if they fail to licence the property and if prosecuted and convicted, the courts could impose an unlimited fine.
According to Lambeth council, the licence fee of £923 will be used to cover the cost of administering the licence over a five-year period, and managing and enforcing the licensing regime.
Previously, Housing Minister Matthew Pennycook has told councils must not profit from selective licensing schemes. However, a previous report by Property118 reveals Nottingham City Council spent millions of pounds on selective licensing and failed to ringfence the scheme.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
When Refinancing Beats Selling | Landlord GuideNext Article
Rents hit near-record highs in August - Goodlord
8 months ago | 6 comments
8 months ago | 1 comments
8 months ago | 7 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 754
11:40 AM, 2nd September 2025, About 8 months ago
So by Lambeth not enforcing or pursuing the rogue LLs to get them to stop their poor behaviour, they penalise all the good LLs (and tenants) through licensing, thus chasing low hanging fruit only, whilst adding to the coffers.
Their scarce resources (officers) will be diverted from pursuing the rogues who will continue under the radar and likely multiply.
Clearly no flaws in that policy….