Higher EPC exemption cost cap could push landlords out of the market – warns industry body

Higher EPC exemption cost cap could push landlords out of the market – warns industry body

EPC graph with a person touching a digital screen, green round buttons with symbols and text Energy Efficency
12:03 AM, 27th May 2025, 11 months ago 7

Propertymark is warning the government to scrap the proposed £15,000 cost cap for exemptions on energy-efficiency upgrades, saying it will push many landlords out of the market.

The industry body says the government must not avoid “a one-size fits all approach” for EPC targets due to the number of older properties in the private rented sector.

Energy Secretary Ed Miliband has proposed all private rented properties must meet EPC C targets by 2030 and 2028 for new tenancies.

Higher cap will price landlords out of the market

The government has proposed raising the maximum required investment for private rented properties to meet minimum energy efficiency standards to £15,000 before landlords can register for an exemption.

However, a large agency in the West Midlands warns Propertymark that £15,000 is a wholly unrealistic sum to spend on improvements for each property they own, and as a consequence, many landlords will exit the market.

Propertymark believes £5,000 per property is more realistic and reflective of the resources available to landlords.

The industry body says: “We oppose the proposed £15,000 cost cap and recommend a more realistic £5,000 limit.

“Our survey of members shows overwhelming concern that the higher cap will price landlords out of the market or lead to rent hikes that ultimately harm tenants. A lower cap would support affordability and allow landlords to make incremental, impactful improvements.”

EPC metric system must be realistic

Propertymark also warns that reforming the EPC metric system must be realistic and reflect the diverse types of homes in the private rented sector.

The industry body said: “The EPC metric system must work for the entire sector, considering the varying nature of property types throughout the country and the fact that properties in the private rented sector are generally considerably older and of lower value than the rest of the market.”

Propertymark also believes that the timeframe for implementation should be relaxed for both new and existing tenancies.

Timothy Douglas, head of policy and campaigns at Propertymark, said:  “We want to see more energy-efficient homes, but the targets must be realistic and achievable.

“We have long said that the UK Government must do more to understand the finances of landlords and introduce measures that take into account the diverse nature of property types across England and Wales in the private rented sector. The timescales for implementing these changes will be key with recent legislative change in Wales and new proposals via the Renters’ Rights Bill in England.

“We look forward to continuing to engage with the UK Government on this issue, but it is vital that EPC reforms are clarified first and given time to bed-in, until we have sufficient numbers of skilled tradespeople in the market to carry out upgrades, and so that policymakers recognise the huge costs in doing works particularly the impact on landlords with lower value properties.”


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 1581

    8:04 AM, 27th May 2025, About 11 months ago

    I have a 3 bed property with annual rent of £5k. Even if I charge market rate, it would only be £7k.
    According to a 2016 EPC Report, it would cost me £9k to hopefully scrape a C Rating. The tenant would save £256 per year. With inflation, the cost would be over £12,000 and the savings would be greater.
    Rent would increase by between £100 and £150 per month.
    It’s not happening. This is the next property planned for sale.
    The cost cap should be based on the annual LHA rate for the property. In my case, this would be £6,900.

  • Member Since May 2014 - Comments: 89

    10:26 AM, 27th May 2025, About 11 months ago

    I’ve got a pair of 1-bed flats in Seaham, County Durham – cost me £51k a couple of years ago – when the EPC targets looked to have gone away. The certificates say they can only get to a D. How will that work?

    Rent is so low I can’t justify spending too much on them, even if I could reach a C…so the only option appears to be give the happy, long-standing tenants (> 10 years) notice to quit…and sell them. Where will they go? No idea, thankfully not my problem (unless they won’t/can’t leave and I have to evict them through the courts)…and I’d feel terrible evicting them.

    Crazy situation, lose/lose in this case. And in many others I imagine.

  • Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 1581

    11:40 AM, 27th May 2025, About 11 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Neil P at 27/05/2025 – 10:26
    Neil

    Yes it is crazy but we should expect nothing less from the Loony Left.

    The answer is that your rental properties will probably be sold to first time buyers who will not need to improve the EPC Rating. This will do nothing for Net Zero.

    Maybe Serco will be allowed to lease them from you and seek an exemption from the EPC requirement. They have a better chance of gaining an exemption than either you or I.

    On the other hand, it’s likely that your properties could reach a C Rating or better despite the assessment stating otherwise. Might cost £15k.

  • Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 13

    12:21 PM, 27th May 2025, About 11 months ago

    This is crazy and I’m pretty sure that the way landlords are being treated breaks the equalities act.

    Where do government bodies get the figures from of all that money that landlords just have lying around. I can’t afford £5k if it was the TOTAL cost for all my properties. So I’m going to have to remortgage the one property with equity to get it to EPC C, then wait until I have equity in others or max out my credit cards or sell – and all those voids do not make any sort of good business sense.

    Then I’ll have to put the rent up on all my properties to pay the extra debt, ….poor tenants. The tenant will have extra rent to pay but will not have cheaper bills because they’ll get condensation so they will keep the heating on more. Which we all know won’t help.

    Condensation from the measures to make an older property into an airtight facsimile of a new one, without understanding how the older houses need to breathe.

    At what point do the government acknowledge that being a landlord isn’t about being an invester with loads of money, and recognise that for the vast majority of landlords its about making a living wage or pension.

    When will the government start to treat landlords with equality, in other words in parity with every other uk business.

    The Equality Act 2010 includes a public sector Equality Duty that requires that public bodies have due regard to the need to eliminate discrimination and
    advance equality of opportunity.

    How do we encourage government to actively eliminate the discrimination against landlords created by Section 24 that means they cannot offset their asset costs against their revenue. Hire car firms have a similar business model to landlords yet no-one has said their finance costs are not allowed.

    They same can be asked of EPC C where social housing and residential owners are not required to make the same highly necessary eco ‘improvements’ out of their pocket on an arbitary timetable.

    I’d support someone who knew how to fight the inequality that I and others can clearly see.

  • Member Since February 2025 - Comments: 10

    6:27 PM, 27th May 2025, About 11 months ago

    We are selling. The blokes an idiot ( you know who I mean) . No idea in my opinion.

  • Member Since February 2023 - Comments: 12

    11:29 PM, 27th May 2025, About 11 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Carol Wilson at 27/05/2025 – 12:21
    Landlords are not a distinct group in terms of Labour’s 2010 Equality legislation (unlike LGBTQ etc or Travellers) so the Government can do what it wants if it passes the legislation regardless of any harmful outcomes!

  • Member Since January 2025 - Comments: 14

    7:26 AM, 15th June 2025, About 10 months ago

    I will have sold up everything by then.. those that think most landlords can afford the improvements, due to being mortgage free, are delusional!!

    The Government have screwed us into the ground, well done, let’s hope you can provide accommodation for the vast number of people looking to rent, who are predominantly foreign nationals now!!

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles