Tenants face stamp duty bills under periodic tenancies - Financial Times

Tenants face stamp duty bills under periodic tenancies – Financial Times

Calendar and stamp duty bag illustrating annual rent thresholds and tax risk under periodic tenancies
9:41 AM, 2nd February 2026, 3 months ago 12

The government is apparently working on a fix to an anomaly in the Renters’ Rights Act that could see huge numbers of tenants paying stamp duty.

According to the Financial Times, under current tax rules, an indefinite or periodic tenancy requires a stamp duty land tax calculation each year.

Liability is triggered once cumulative rent paid reaches £125,000, at which point tax becomes due.

To illustrate the point, the newspaper highlights a student let in London with eight friends paying £1,000 a month. That would equate to £96,000 annually and under the Act, the students would be a facing a stamp duty bill of £573 just after a year.

Tenants will face the bill from May when assured shorthold tenancies are scrapped and replaced with periodic tenancies.

Stamp duty on leases

The Financial Times reports that around 150,000 private renting households could fall within scope within three years, rising to 250,000 by 2031 as tenancies roll on.

Stamp duty on leases is charged at 1% of the net present value of rent above the £125,000 threshold.

While the sums involved are usually small, the administrative burden is not.

Tenants would need to calculate and submit returns annually; a process the paper says they are likely to expect or understand.

Tenants will need to file a return

Tenants will also need to know that late filing attracts an automatic £100 penalty, rising to £200 after three months.

However, reaching the stamp duty threshold would take time for most renters.

The average London tenant would need around six years of occupation before cumulative rent hits £125,000.

Periodic tenancies could be liable

A government official confirmed to the FT that newly defined periodic tenancies could become liable but said the vast majority of private tenants would never reach that point.

The official added that where a lease is renewed following renegotiation, the term is treated as starting again, limiting exposure.

They also said that any changes needed to ‘accommodate the new tenancy system’ would be announced in a Budget.

One option under consideration would be to delay filing and payment until the stamp duty due reaches £5,000.

That would restrict liability to high-value properties after many years of occupation.

A government spokesperson told the FT: “The department is aware of the potential issue, and we are looking at how best to resolve [it].

“It is not an immediate problem for any tenant.

“No one will be affected until the rent they are paying is worth more than £125,000 — which would take most tenants more than seven years.”


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since May 2023 - Comments: 225

    4:53 PM, 3rd February 2026, About 3 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Jo Westlake at 11:24

    Doesn’t GDPR prevent landlords from keeping records for longer than necessary?
    No, GDPR requires that landlords determine how long it is necessary to keep records.
    Generally that is:
    1. Primary purpose.
    Records required to support the primary business purpose, for example to administer a tenancy.
    2. Secondary purpose.
    Records required to mitigate risks from statutory instruments that are relevant or arising from the primary purpose, for example the statute of limitations that applies to asbestos contamination.
    This means Primary for the duration of the Tenancy and Deposit Resolution, with Secondary for 10 years for statue of limitations to elapse.
    Only then does the right to be forgotten apply, so record destruction is required.

  • Member Since December 2025 - Comments: 17

    10:22 AM, 9th March 2026, About 2 months ago

    I hate it when they say “the vast majority”. My properties are in Central London and here it might be reasonable to say that “the vast majority” of tenancies will reach thresholds within a couple of years. Most of my tenants work within the financial sector and will not want to be vulnerable to accusations that they have not complied with tax rules or with legislation. Tenants often stay surprisingly long. They work long hours, are prepared to pay more for a convenient location and if they are reasonably happy, won’t bother to look for somewhere else.

    Central London property has already been hit by the exodus of expats, along with all the other issues affecting the PRS, as well as second home council tax surcharges for those renting a London pied de terre. (Including those seconded to London for a six month or year long contract who decide not to uproot their family.) All on top of some expensive licensing fees and the sheer impossibility of finding tradesmen willing to pay the extortionate parking and congestion charges.

    Deciding something is not a problem because if only affects a minority is mad. The impact of some parts of the property market could be significant.

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles