8 months ago | 2 comments
A study into the potential impact of the Renters’ Rights Bill suggests England’s letting agents can adapt and even thrive under the new rules.
The analysis from property software firm, SME Professional, which looked at what happened to Scotland’s PRS after the Private Housing (Tenancies) Act became law in 2016.
It also abolished no-fault evictions, ended fixed-term tenancies and introduced stricter landlord regulations.
The report says that far from harming the industry, the changes boosted letting agents’ businesses.
The firm’s managing director, Fraser Sutherland, said: “The Scottish experience demonstrates that robust tenant protections need not harm the rental market or agency businesses.
“Our customers in England can be reassured that the upcoming reforms may not reduce business opportunities.”
He added: “While regional variations across the UK will no doubt exist – between different regions or between types of landlords – on the whole, Scotland’s experience suggests these changes could actually boost demand for professional services and foster a more stable, well-regulated rental market.”
The chief executive of the Scottish Association of Landlords (SAL), John Blackwood, said: “The growing legislative burden on agents in Scotland has not led to a reduction in managed properties.
“On the contrary, agencies have seen a slight increase in their overall portfolios.
“This trend indicates that, as regulatory requirements have become more complex, many landlords have opted for professional management services and have thereby strengthened agency business.”
The report says there was a surge in demand from Scottish landlords for professional management services, with more than 60% of landlords raising rents in 2024, up from just 8% previously.
This has driven revenue growth for agents, alongside longer tenancies and a more stable market, the firm says.
Mr Sutherland said: “Fears that tighter regulation would lead to market contraction have not materialised.
“The private rented sector in Scotland expanded significantly following tenants’ rights reforms, with tenancy lengths increasing and landlord satisfaction remaining high.
“Far from triggering an exodus, the new rules have led to greater professionalism and tenant stability.”
The Renters’ Rights Bill is expected to gain Royal Assent in September.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
PRS sees slowest tenant deposit growth in eight yearsNext Article
More landlords switch to limited company ownership
8 months ago | 2 comments
8 months ago | 8 comments
9 months ago | 9 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 1999
3:08 PM, 21st August 2025, About 8 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Ryan Stevens at 15/08/2025 – 22:03
That’s the point that I’m trying to make even if perhaps I didn’t make it as clearly as you just did with your worked example. Once your gross income from all sources including your BTL income exceeds the £50K GROSS income threshold you are penalised.
So if income from employment, self-employment or pensions together with gross income from renting property takes you above £50K GROSS you are penalised on any gross income from residential property.
It is very easy to exceed £50K of GROSS income if you have mortgaged BTL property, even without much net income.
This isn’t a penalty you experience if you are running an incorporated business. It also isn’t a penalty you experience if you derive income from commercial property. And it’s hard to see what public benefit this policy serves when there’s a shortage of residential property.
Member Since January 2024 - Comments: 342
3:31 PM, 21st August 2025, About 8 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Beaver at 21/08/2025 – 15:08
It also has other consequences, because the rental income before interest is added to other income it can mean that landlords lose their personal allowance. This is despite the fact that they would have been entitled to personal allowances, had the interest been deducted from their net rental income. So they can end up paying an effective rate of 60% on the rental income, before deducting interest at 20%.
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 1999
3:47 PM, 21st August 2025, About 8 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Ryan Stevens at 21/08/2025 – 15:31
I know. It’s completely bonkers. Even if the collective view of the main parties was that they wanted to encourage a move to ‘energy efficient housing’ using a less than perfect EPC system you’d think that you’d at least be able to offset your costs for EPC band C+ and yet you can’t.