1 month ago | 4 comments
A landlord has reportedly been offered £32,520 more a year to house asylum seekers in a flat already used to accommodate families through a council.
The Sun reports that the proposed three-year deal included bills, council tax and maintenance costs.
Clearsprings Ready Homes, a Home Office accommodation contractor, offered £4,500 a month for the three-bedroom property in south London, compared with the £1,790 paid by Southwark Council.
The landlord declined, saying that switching contracts would put families at serious risk of homelessness.
The anonymous landlord told The Sun: “I already rent to Southwark Council, and they [Clearsprings] are able to offer significantly more than the local authority, which to me is bizarre.
“The council has a ceiling on what they are allowed to pay landlords like myself.”
He added: “For a three-bed flat I get £1,790 from the local authority to house families, while I would rent it to Clearsprings for £4,500 per month.
“I didn’t go with them because it would have meant terminating my contract with Southwark Council and putting families at serious risk of homelessness.”
The newspaper reports that Clearsprings is understood to be approaching landlords who provide homes for councils, students and vulnerable people, including those fleeing domestic abuse.
It obtained a document which reportedly identifies Bedford, Southampton, the Forest of Dean, Caerphilly and Wrexham among the areas where additional properties are being sought.
Prospective landlords are also being told that homes may need extensive refurbishment before being used.
The landlord questioned why accommodation intended for asylum seekers appeared to face more demanding refurbishment requirements than properties housing homeless British families.
The Home Office said contractual limits protected taxpayers from accommodation providers paying above the agreed rate.
A spokesman said: “We pay a capped and contractually agreed rate to accommodation providers.
“Any amount above that is covered by the contractor and not taxpayers.
“We are working to fairly house asylum seekers across the country and closing every hotel, saving taxpayers over £1billion on asylum support since the election.”
11 comments on this article
A different perspective could help you spot an issue, avoid a mistake or find a better way forward. Read the comments and add your own views if you wish.
Previous Article
Landlords invited to inform government’s building safety reviewNext Article
Tenants urged to 'flood' tribunals over rent rises
1 month ago | 4 comments
5 months ago | 3 comments
1 year ago | 2 comments
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2689
11:52 AM, 30th October 2026, About 2 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by Lucas Radebee at 23/10/2026 – 18:29
Presumably the details of these HMOs being rented out by Clearspring, Serco, Meers and anybody else the Home Office decides to use with its big fat taxpayer cheque-book will be listed on Labour’s new Private Rental Sector landlord database along with the rent paid, thereby pushing up average rents in any area that they are located. And presumably ultimately these rental figures will feed in to market rents being considered by rent tribunals in rent reviews.
And also, you would think that if the personal details of small landlords have to be listed on Labour’s Private Rental Sector landlord database, the landlord ownership details of these HMOs will have to be listed as well. Or if they aren’t listed (e.g. for security reasons) then you would think that small landlords and smaller businesses than Clearspring, Serco or Meers who have less resource to protect themselves would be given the option to opt-out of having their details publicly listed as well.