S.E. Landlord
S.E. Landlord
Registered with Property118.com
22nd July 2015
Total Posts
0
Total Comments
154
Registered with Property118.com
22nd July 2015
Total Posts
0
Total Comments
154
Reply to comment left by Appalled Landlord at 18/11/2016 - 10:16
Reply to the comment left by "Appalled Landlord" at "18/11/2016 - 10:16": Already answered that on 17/11/2016 at 9.46.
Read More →Reply to comment left by Appalled Landlord at 17/11/2016 - 23:16
Reply to the comment left by "Appalled Landlord" at "17/11/2016 - 23:16": As I indicated earlier it was a hypothetical situation to illustrate the different tax treatments of loan interest and dividends, I could have quoted any rate but chose...
Read More →Reply to comment left by Appalled Landlord at 17/11/2016 - 17:32
Reply to the comment left by "Appalled Landlord" at "17/11/2016 - 17:32": AL, in this hypothetical example I am the director of the company that is being funded either from a loan or share investment of one million. I would...
Read More →Reply to comment left by Appalled Landlord at 17/11/2016 - 11:24
Reply to the comment left by "Appalled Landlord" at "17/11/2016 - 11:24": AL, let's assume when I decided to be a landlord I asked a wealthy friend to fund me with a million pounds to buy property and said I...
Read More →Reply to comment left by NW Landlord at 17/11/2016 - 09:32
Reply to the comment left by "NW Landlord" at "17/11/2016 - 09:32": Do I agree with something that increases cost, no. Do I understand why it has been introduced, yes. In many areas BTL is an investment for capital growth...
Read More →Reply to comment left by NW Landlord at 17/11/2016 - 09:01
Reply to the comment left by "NW Landlord" at "17/11/2016 - 09:01": I cannot see why the tax treatment of funding of share capital should be different to the tax treatment of loans.
Read More →17th November 2016, 9 years ago
If a business is funded by share capital tax is paid before profits are distributed, why should funding via loans be treated differently? There is an argument that both should be treated in the same way, so either dividends are...
Read More →Reply to comment left by Michael Barnes at 15/10/2016 - 20:50
Reply to the comment left by "Michael Barnes" at "15/10/2016 - 20:50": Pity CGT isn't treated in the same way.
Read More →Reply to comment left by Michael Barnes at 15/10/2016 - 16:21
Reply to the comment left by "Michael Barnes" at "15/10/2016 - 16:21": I think tax is limited to being on the actual rent (assuming no expenses) if let below market rent to family but allowable expenses would also be limited...
Read More →15th October 2016, 9 years ago
There is a strong possibility that the demands were correctly issued to the previous owner, if so and not paid then they will fall to the current owner. I think I would seek to recover the cost from the solicitors...
Read More →Reply to comment left by Dr Rosalind Beck at 13/10/2016 - 20:13
Reply to the comment left by "Dr Rosalind Beck" at "13/10/2016 - 20:13": You compared Section 24 with Mugabe seizing private property, even a cursory review of what took place then and it is clear that there is no comparison...
Read More →Reply to comment left by Dr Rosalind Beck at 13/10/2016 - 09:16
Reply to the comment left by "Dr Rosalind Beck" at "13/10/2016 - 09:16": To compare the effect of Section 24 with State seize of private property is completely inaccurate. Section 24 may result in some landlords reducing or selling their...
Read More →19th September 2016, 10 years ago
What does the tenancy agreement say about rent if property uninhabitable?
Read More →5th September 2016, 10 years ago
I don't know if there is a legal requirement but I think you should install the alarms.
Read More →5th September 2016, 10 years ago
I doubt that there is any comeback as it is unlikely you would have had an unconditional commitment to providing the funds or to provide them by a certain time.
Read More →5th September 2016, 10 years ago
It may be the freeholder is playing hardball, but it could also be that the freeholder has had a Health & Safety Inspection carried out and the report says they would cause an obstruction in the event of a fire....
Read More →Reply to comment left by Mark Alexander at 05/09/2016 - 11:19
Reply to the comment left by "Mark Alexander" at "05/09/2016 - 11:19": If my memory serves me correctly there was a court case and it may now possible for the pension fund to be taken into account if the person...
Read More →30th August 2016, 10 years ago
From how you describe the effects of the water leak it suggests the flat owner causing the problems is on at least the second floor with you on the first floor - if so exactly what land has he incorporated...
Read More →30th August 2016, 10 years ago
It is a loan to fund improvements, as such I believe the repayments are the owner's responsibility.
Read More →30th August 2016, 10 years ago
If it was a buy to let from outset and assuming it was transferred into joint names after you married - on a joint tenancy basis or 50/50 if tenants in common - then you use the original purchase price...
Read More →Showing 20 of 154 comments