1 month ago
Council tax premiums are influencing whether nearly three-quarters of holiday let owners participate in the market, research reveals.
Cumberland Building Society’s latest Holiday Let Index found that 72% of owners reported a major or moderate influence from premiums on second homes and holiday lets.
Of those, 31% described that influence as being ‘major’, while 41% said it was ‘moderate’.
Also, the removal of full mortgage-interest relief affected decisions for 70%, with the abolition of the Furnished Holiday Let tax regime and changes to capital allowances each highlighted by 67%.
Grant Seaton, Cumberland’s head of intermediary lending, said: “What these findings show is that the decision to invest in a holiday let is being influenced by far more than the property itself.
“Owners have already had to contend with considerable changes to the tax treatment of holiday lets, and the latest Budget announcement means those whose profits are subject to property income tax could face another increase in their tax bills from April 2027.”
He added: “Location could therefore become an even greater consideration.
“Properties with similar purchase prices and rental potential could face different costs or restrictions depending on the local authority they sit within, so understanding the local position is becoming a much bigger part of assessing whether an investment stacks up over the longer term.”
Among the 92 respondents who answered a question about a possible C5 planning class restricting holiday let numbers locally, 55% said they would be very or somewhat likely to sell.
Higher borrowing costs would leave some owners close to breaking even: 27% said that would be their position if their mortgage interest rate rose by another percentage point over the next 12 months.
However, 40% said their holiday let would remain viable despite reduced profits, while 15% would need to change their approach through pricing or cost reductions.
On registration, 84% said they were prepared for the National Registration Scheme, compared with 16% who were not.
Meanwhile, Cumberland has announced a partnership with the Professional Association of Self-Caterers (PASC UK) to expand its support for holiday let businesses.
The mutual will provide finance expertise to members and inform the trade body’s lobbying on finance issues affecting short-term and holiday let lending.
PASC UK represents the professional holiday let sector at Westminster and in the Senedd.
1 comment on this article
A different perspective could help you spot an issue, avoid a mistake or find a better way forward. Read the comments and add your own views if you wish.
1 month ago
2 months ago | 9 comments
2 months ago | 5 comments
Member Since September 2026 - Comments: 32
2:52 AM, 4th November 2026, About 48 minutes ago
Hi there,
That 72% reporting council tax premiums as a major or moderate influence is the figure worth sitting with, because the premium turns on a test most owners don’t expect.
Section 11C of the Local Government Finance Act 1992, inserted by the Levelling-up and Regeneration Act 2023, lets a billing authority add up to 100% where there’s no resident and the dwelling is substantially furnished. Section 6(5) defines resident as someone whose sole or main residence is there, so short stay guests never count. A fully booked holiday let is still a dwelling with no resident, and occupancy won’t save you.
Leaving council tax for business rates is the only real escape, and that test sits in section 66 of the 1988 Act. You’ll need 140 days available for commercial short period letting, and under subsection 2BZA, 70 days actually let in the prior year. That’s where it compounds. Premiums soften demand, bookings slip under 70, non domestic status goes, and you’re back in council tax with the premium on top.
Timing’s kinder. Section 11C(3) requires a first determination at least a year before the year it applies to, with notice published locally inside 21 days. So you’ll find your council’s April 2027 position now.
OJ
Am I a Legal Landlord