Build-to-rent describes housing developed specifically for renting, commonly operated as a managed scheme. The NRLA’s summary argues that bringing residents into regeneration areas can also support local businesses and the development of mixed neighbourhoods.
These figures concern the selected areas, and the published summary is the source used here. They do not establish that buying beside a large rental development will produce higher rents or capital growth. My interest is in the questions the research prompts us to ask locally.
Start with the people who would want to live there. I would look at the employment, transport and everyday amenities supporting demand. A development brochure might describe an emerging neighbourhood, but I would want to know which improvements are already in place, which are funded and which remain proposals.
A new station entrance, a major employer or a useful shopping area could make a location more attractive. The practical question for an existing landlord is whether their property serves the people likely to benefit, at a rent those people can afford.
That requires attention to the actual journey to work, the layout of the home and the alternatives available nearby. A flat ten minutes from a station on the map may feel quite different if the walking route is unpleasant or inconvenient. Local knowledge has real value when you use it to test the sales pitch.
Count the competition as carefully as the opportunity. More people moving into an area may help shops and services, while the new homes also give prospective tenants more choice. I would examine how many homes are planned, their sizes, likely rents and expected completion dates.
The council’s planning register and the developer’s published information are useful starting points, alongside resources such as Bidwells’ build-to-rent map. Keep a distinction between a proposed scheme, one under construction and homes actually available to rent; each has a different significance for your next letting.
I would then ask local agents what they are seeing in enquiries, viewings and agreed lettings. If similar flats are taking longer to let, or several developments are due to open together, that belongs in the cashflow assessment even where the longer-term outlook for the neighbourhood looks promising.
Compare the offer from the tenant’s perspective. A headline asking rent is only part of that comparison. Check what is included, whether an introductory offer affects the initial cost, and what a resident would pay separately for services, parking or other facilities.
The question is what your own property provides for its total cost. It might offer more space, a garden, a different layout or a location that works better for a particular household. Establish which features people value through enquiries and tenant feedback before spending money trying to imitate the neighbouring development.
For example, I would want a clear reason to install an expensive feature simply because it appears in a new scheme’s marketing. Improving warmth, storage, decoration or the speed of repairs may be a more useful response for a particular property, but the likely benefit and ongoing cost should still be assessed.
Study the service as well as the building. How easy is it to arrange a viewing, understand the charges, report a repair and get an answer? These are things a smaller landlord or their managing agent can examine and improve without commissioning an entire development.
I would pay particular attention to what existing tenants say they find frustrating. A clear point of contact, reliable appointments and updates when work is delayed are practical matters to review. Where an improvement costs money, judge it against the problem it solves and the resources available.
There is also a limit to what another investor’s decision can tell you. A fund developing at scale may have a different purchase price, financing arrangement, investment period and operating model from someone buying a single flat at its advertised price. Your purchase has to work on your own terms.
That brings me back to the individual property. In my case study of a £3.4 million portfolio, examining the properties separately revealed substantial differences in cashflow and the use of the owners’ equity. A changing local market adds another reason to revisit that analysis.
Would a modest improvement help an existing property remain competitive? Is the borrowing still suitable for the income it produces? Does retaining it fit the owner’s plans for retirement, management workload and future investment? Those questions are more useful when supported by evidence about what is happening around the property.
If you would like help examining how those changes fit your wider plans, a Property118 consultation can help you identify the information and commercial options to work through. The objective is to give you a clearer basis for your own decisions, with the appropriate professional advice where needed.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with