2 months ago | 5 comments
The government claims the Renters’ Rights Act addresses overt discriminatory practices used by landlords and letting agents.
In a written parliamentary answer, housing minister Matthew Pennycook said the act gives councils strong enforcement powers to tackle rental discrimination.
Under the Renters’ Rights Act, it is illegal for landlords and letting agents to discriminate against prospective tenants who receive benefits or have children, with fines of up to £7,000 for those who break the rules.
In a written parliamentary question, Labour MP Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi, asked: “What recent steps has the government taken to ensure compliance with the (a) Equality Act 2010 and (b) Renters’ Rights Act within the rented housing sector”.
Mr Pennycook said: “The Renters’ Rights Act provides local authorities with strong investigatory and enforcement powers to bear down on rental discrimination practices in the private rented sector.
“It addresses both overt discriminatory practices, such as ‘No DSS’ adverts, and situations where landlords or letting agents use other indirect practices in order to prevent someone entering into a tenancy.
“The government is increasing ring-fenced civil penalties to support a ‘polluter pays’ approach to enforcement of the new tenancy system.”
He added: “In accordance with the New Burdens Doctrine, we will ensure additional net costs on local authorities resulting from the Act are fully funded. To that end, my Department is providing £41.12 million to local housing authorities for this financial year to help them undertake their new enforcement responsibilities. This funding is in addition to the £18.2 million provided in 2025/26.
“Our aim over the long term is to establish a sustainable funding system for private rented sector enforcement based on future Private Rented Sector Database fee revenues.”
Under the guidance, the government list certain circumstances of rental discrimination including:
Landlords will not be able to stop someone doing any of the following because they have children or get benefits (or you think they do):
Accessing information
Information could include:
Viewing a property
This will include refusing to let someone view the property or knowingly making it difficult for them to view it, such as by offering unreasonable times.
Renting a property
This will include poor treatment to make it less likely for someone to want to rent the property, for example, a rental agreement that puts the tenant at a disadvantage.
Be the first to comment
Have you dealt with something similar? Share what you learned, raise a question or offer a perspective your peers may find useful.
Previous Article
Landlords face huge cannabis farm bills
2 months ago | 5 comments
4 months ago | 1 comments
7 months ago | 23 comments
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with