Leading economist warns against short-term PRS tax raids ahead of Budget
Speculation about new tax grabs on the private rented sector (PRS) could inflict long-term harm on the economy, a leading economist has warned.
Paul Johnson, the former head of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said talk of further taxes on landlords was ‘economically damaging’ and reflected ‘a lack of understanding about investors’.
His comments came during the latest episode of Listen Up Landlords, the National Residential Landlords Association’s (NRLA) podcast.
Mr Johnson was speaking with NRLA chief executive Ben Beadle and co-host Richard Blanco.
Landlords not under-taxed
Johnson, now Provost at The Queen’s College, Oxford, expressed frustration at what he sees as a piecemeal approach to housing taxation.
He said: “I think you need to think very carefully about how to tax housing and how to tax rental housing, and the first myth to bust is the idea that somehow landlords are under-taxed relative to owner-occupiers, which is complete nonsense.
“If you make it more expensive to be a landlord, then there will be some combination of fewer landlords and higher rent.”
He urged ministers to develop a coherent, long-term plan for housing and property tax that would not change with every Budget.
Without such stability, he warned, uncertainty will persist and the PRS will continue to be seen as an easy target.
Abolish Stamp Duty
Mr Johnson also called for the abolition of stamp duty, describing it as ‘the worst tax we have’.
He added: “If I were chancellor for the day, I would abolish it.”
The economist also says there’s a ‘strong case’ for aligning Capital Gains Tax with income tax rates but fears the impact on inflation.
Tax strategy to help landlords
Ben Beadle said the government should take Mr Johnson’s words seriously as it prepares for the November Budget.
He explained: “Ahead of the Budget the government must heed Paul Johnson’s sage advice.
“Too often the way rental property is taxed is based on nothing more than topping up the coffers from one year to the next.
“Such knee jerk and short-term thinking is no way to run an economy.”
He added: “What is needed is a consistent tax strategy that gives responsible landlords the confidence to invest in the decent long-term homes for rent that so many people desperately need.”
Comments
Have Your Say
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since March 2024 - Comments: 281
1:11 PM, 16th October 2025, About 6 months ago
“ The economist also says there’s a ‘strong case’ for aligning Capital Gains Tax with income tax rates but fears the impact on inflation.”
What is this impact ‘on’ inflation? Doesn’t make sense to me. On the assumption it should be ‘impact of inflation’, that implies he supports aligning CGT with income tax rates but without any indexation – hence the concern that there is a lot of tax to pay on gains that are only due to inflation.
This is key – when CGT was aligned with income tax in the 1980s, indexation was available. Just upping the rates without indexation – bearing in mind that the post tax gain for many is potentially subject to another hit from 40% IHT on death – is something that will possibly reduce CGT tax take, at least in the short term (Laffer curve).
However aligning the rates and allowing indexation might benefit long term property holders. My remaining rental was bought 35 years ago so I could be better off with 40% tax less indexation. But not good for Reeves of course.
As no chancellor has made the move in recent years despite speculation every budget, I presume it doesn’t stack up either with or without indexation as far as getting in extra revenue which all chancellors have been desperate for.
Member Since March 2018 - Comments: 8
10:54 PM, 16th October 2025, About 6 months ago
This is an ideologically driven government that sees landlords as rich non-working people who are easy pickings and do not vote labour. We need the NRLA to represent we landlords just the way that unions represent their members with actions that will hurt the government.