Earlsdon

Registered with Property118.com
Wednesday 22nd April 2020


Latest Comments

Total Number of Property118 Comments: 7

Earlsdon

13:04 PM, 17th September 2021, About a month ago

HMO rooms rated as Band A?

I would rent the whole house out on one AST if possible, do not allocate tenants an exclusive right to occupy a particular room. This provides each tenant the right to occupy any part of the property, they can of course agree between themselves which room they wish to occupy and pay a share of the rent on that basis. This is possible with student lets but more problematic if your tenants are transient.... Read More

Earlsdon

12:04 PM, 12th February 2021, About 8 months ago

Council tax per room for HMO in Nottingham!

I recall reading some time ago a similar issue (perhaps on this site). An option is to let on a joint basis to the group of tenants and not on a room by room basis. Let the tenants decide themselves which rooms they occupy. Further evidence that they swap rooms (by mutual consent) during the tenancy may assist in proving that the property is one dwelling. I don't know what type of tenants you have so this may not be feasible.... Read More

Earlsdon

11:39 AM, 13th January 2021, About 9 months ago

HMO Application Misuse of Data?

Thanks for your reply, homemaker. To answer that question the authority has it on record despite me providing evidence to the contrary that I have committed a Criminal Offence (Operating a HMO without a Licence). The offer of a licence under the least favourable terms indicates that they have not corrected this information. The current system of Licencing is onerous, burdensome, inefficient and built on the conviction that most LL are non compliant. (Head of Licencing in my LA actually said 80% of LL don't know what they're doing in the public consultation meeting). These are just my thoughts on whether it would be reasonable to pursue these matters and push back against this current system. The relevant piece of legislation is:

Article 5 of the UK GDPR (d) accurate and, where necessary, kept up to date; every reasonable step must be taken to ensure that personal data that are inaccurate, having regard to the purposes for which they are processed, are erased or rectified without delay (‘accuracy’);
Article 83(5)(a) states that infringements of the basic principles for processing personal data are subject to the highest tier of administrative fines. (Subject to enormous fines).... Read More

Earlsdon

17:41 PM, 12th January 2021, About 10 months ago

HMO Application Misuse of Data?

I don't know if Admin have the option to edit the original piece as there are errors with the dates, this is how it should read:
I would be interested to hear what the readers’ views and opinions are regarding my recent dealings with the Local Authority regarding an application to licence an HMO. By way of introduction, I am a landlord operating in the Midlands for just over 20 years. I have a number of smaller HMOs and several mandatory HMOs, the most recent being the one that is subject to my issue: In short, I made an online application to licence this HMO and the autumn of 2019 and paid the appropriate fee online.

In the spring of 2020, I received a letter from Housing Enforcement that they had conducted an “HMO Proactive Inspection” of the property and detailed that I was in breach of a number of regulations (Gas safety EICR) and that the property was unlicensed. I was also invited to apply for a licence and as the property was “found to be unlicensed” is would be under the most unfavourable terms…

Accordingly, I contacted the LA to correct them that a full & complete licence application and fee had been made (including Gas Safety, EICR records etc). They initially denied it was on their system, but they eventually conceded when I forwarded copies and receipts. I received no apology.

Eventually, in December 2020 I received a notice from the LA of their intention to grant a licence for the property for one year at the maximum fee. To add insult to injury the Licence being offered would expire in March 2021! I was further advised that should I wish to make representation over the terms of the licence I had 21 days. I made those representations by email immediately but have yet to receive a reply, the 21 days have now expired.

So, the pragmatist in me suggests I should settle the matter if the LA concede they have made a mistake and the appropriate fee is applied. To that end do I offer the fee now (£150) of pay the fee requested (£800) and pursue a refund?
However, I am minded that Landlords in my LA are being held to a higher standard than the LA authority themselves: For example, should one mistake be made on an application you would not be eligible for the most favourable licence. I am also reminded that Liverpool CC have misused Landlord’s data. I believe there are a number of potential Data Breaches or am I being vexatious?
1. Failed to register the initial HMO application properly
2. Conducted an inspection of an “unlicensed property” while in possession of information that would prove otherwise.
3. Potentially, incorrectly informed tenants that the property was unlicensed (Criminal Act)
4. Having been informed that the information they held was incorrect failed to correct it.
5. Used the information that was incorrectly held to discriminate against my application: Offered the HMO Licence under the most unfavourable terms possible.

Clearly some above have more merit than others but is it a worthwhile pursuit to take these issues to the Data Manager and ICO, do you believe I have a credible case?... Read More

Earlsdon

17:22 PM, 12th January 2021, About 10 months ago

HMO Application Misuse of Data?

Reply to the comment left by Ron H-W at 12/01/2021 - 17:08
Yes, you're correct my dates are wrong but I can't find the option to edit the piece. By way of correction I applied for the licence in 2019 and was offered a one year licence that expires this March 2021. So three months left.... Read More