sam
sam
Registered with Property118.com
11th July 2013
Total Posts
0
Total Comments
205
Registered with Property118.com
11th July 2013
Total Posts
0
Total Comments
205
25th February 2023, 3 years ago
We have had tenants walked away with curtains, washing machine, furniture etc - even doors. I took the first one to court - 30 years ago and lost. Henceforth, I decided discretion was the better part of valour and practiced...
Read More →25th February 2023, 3 years ago
Honestly folks, what a load of rubbish we espouse here. You might be right. You might be wrong. So what? How to get rid of a tenant you dont want is the issue. How much money, time and hassle is...
Read More →31st December 2022, 3 years ago
Thank you Philip. Ah. Double taxation generally means you don’t have to pay tax again at your resident country. Or the tax you paid at the source country can be used to offset tax liability at the host country. Lots...
Read More →Reply to comment left by philip allen at 30/12/2022 - 11:23
Reply to the comment left by philip allen at 30/12/2022 - 11:23Thank you Philip. Let’s not get too excited now. What I said isn’t going to happen. Politicians need to justify their existence. They can’t stop meddling. I don’t believe...
Read More →29th December 2022, 3 years ago
In the Far East 3rd world country where I came from 50 years ago, life is a lot simpler. Both tenants and landlords understand that: *Nobody owes anybody a living. *Nobody is forcing anybody to live anywhere. *Dont pay rent,...
Read More →Reply to comment left by Bernie Wales at 30/08/2022 - 17:13
You mean the %age is of ‘total’ leases? Ie not possible to enfranchise when total ‘qualifying’ lessees is less than 50% of ‘total’ leases.
Read More →Reply to comment left by Bernie Wales at 30/08/2022 - 14:59
Thank u Bernie. My question was 50% of what? ‘Qualifying’ lessees or ‘total’ leaseholders? In my example, if 50% (or more) of the leases r non qualifying, how r the remaining lessees ever going to b able to enfranchise or...
Read More →28th May 2022, 4 years ago
Mark - another point of view Our government’s policy has caused a significant no of LLs to leave the market resulting in a reduction in supply. The result for the renters: renters hv less choices n have to pay higher...
Read More →Reply to comment left by Chris Bryan at 09/05/2022 - 16:18
Well done. N congratulations.
Read More →Reply to comment left by Chris Daniel at 08/05/2022 - 08:34
Reply to the comment left by Chris @ Possession Friend at 08/05/2022 - 08:34Peanuts - considering the cost of justice delayed. Especially if cost can be recoverable. BUT it shouldnt be like this though.
Read More →Reply to comment left by Bernard Purcell at 07/05/2022 - 15:41
Reply to the comment left by Bernard Purcell at 07/05/2022 - 15:41Wonder if the court system wud work differently if it is privatised.
Read More →Reply to comment left by Paul Cartwright at 03/05/2022 - 13:07
Reply to the comment left by Paul Cartwright at 03/05/2022 - 13:07Hi Paul Wud your colleague mind sharing the basis of that advice or the details of the consultant who provided that advice? Also b interested to hear what our...
Read More →Reply to comment left by Bernie Wales at 10/04/2022 - 16:18
TQ Bernie. Yes I understood that’s what daveknowstheregs said. Just find it puzzling. Wud hv expected 50% of ‘qualifying’ leases to suffice. Even lawyers can’t b that dim surely. Is that the same with right to manage ?
Read More →Reply to comment left by David Snowden at 09/04/2022 - 10:28
That’s exactly my confusion - if Chris owns 5 units which disqualifies him from voting, the owners of the other 3 flats, if your logic prevails, r then deprived of their right to enfranchise?
Read More →Reply to comment left by Bernie Wales at 05/04/2022 - 11:01
If Chris owns only 6 of the flats n I own the other 2, wud that make me the only qualifying leaseholder with more than 50% n thus able to enforce Right to Enfranchise? (Presumably, the same logic applies if...
Read More →25th December 2021, 4 years ago
S20 procedure is required when a specific job requires more than £250 per unit within the same accounting period. Or £100/unit for a continual contract like weekly cleaning or gardening. It means 2 x 30 days consultation period n a...
Read More →25th December 2021, 4 years ago
I agree with Bernice that u hv the right to examine financial docs at the agent's office. It might b a first step to satisfy yourself whether the agent is suitable for what u want. A good agent will make...
Read More →16th October 2020, 5 years ago
If your lease docs is silent on this issue, does your freeholder's insistence mean 1. The owners of the 3 flats wud still b responsible exclusively if they r 3 separate entities? 2. The owners of the other flats who...
Read More →22nd August 2020, 6 years ago
I never bought this BS about helping tenents keep their roof over their head. Thats for them to work out for themselves and take respopnsibility for and for the government to educate and help them. I am in business to...
Read More →Reply to comment left by Reluctant Landlord at 22/07/2020 - 12:46
Mind provide contact please?
Read More →Showing 20 of 205 comments