Reply to the comment left by "chris wright" at "06/01/2015 - 20:09": Liars will be liars. The disinfectant of truth and evidence based discussion is not something those enjoying sinecures want out.
Reply to the comment left by "David Lawrenson" at "11/12/2014 - 18:56": Mr Daley has made it clear that he personally supports the Scheme that he has be so involved in writing. I do agree that penalties on criminal landlords...
Reply to the comment left by "Roanch 21" at "11/12/2014 - 16:42": Enfield same as Southwark. They wanted both additional licensing and selective licensing. In the "copy my neighbouring labour council's policies" game that Southwark and the East London councils...
Reply to the comment left by "John Daley" at "11/12/2014 - 16:50": Dear John No judgement was every going to challenge the "terms of the Act". The Courts cannot change Acts of Parliament. The Judge could see that the blatantly...
Thank God this Country still has Judges with intelligence and integrity. John Daley's / Southwark's scheme is a similar disgrace and I pray that it too is struck down and exposed for the self serving, money raising, shafting of landlords...
John - so much of what you say is clearly made up and exaggerated that I am wondering if the purpose of this forum thread is just to wind up landlords and cause them to vent their frustrations and expend...
Reply to the comment left by "John Daley" at "06/11/2014 - 16:53": Dear John I don't think the consultation is fair or balanced. If it was a balanced consultation it would include contra arguments and would not indulge in blatant...
Reply to the comment left by "John Daley" at "04/11/2014 - 14:00": Hi John You say "All the voluntary measures have not had any effect on the deterioration of standards and management that is going on". But your own data...
Reply to the comment left by "chris wright" at "01/11/2014 - 17:21": Hi Chris The fact that the Council undertook 12 housing prosecutions last year is, on its own, largely meaningless. We do not know what these prosecutions were for...
Reply to the comment left by "John Daley" at "30/10/2014 - 15:44": Hi John Thanks for your reply. I do respect the fact that you are engaging in this debate. Nevertheless, I am convinced you are wrong. I understand that...
There is no statistically significant correlation establish in the consultation document between private sector lettings and anti-social behaviour incidence. The only "link" Southwark have data mined is between housing density and ASB incidence I.e. more people (some of whom receive...
Reply to comment left by chris wright at 06/01/2015 - 20:09
Reply to the comment left by "chris wright" at "06/01/2015 - 20:09": Liars will be liars. The disinfectant of truth and evidence based discussion is not something those enjoying sinecures want out.
Read More →Reply to comment left by David Lawrenson at 11/12/2014 - 18:56
Reply to the comment left by "David Lawrenson" at "11/12/2014 - 18:56": Mr Daley has made it clear that he personally supports the Scheme that he has be so involved in writing. I do agree that penalties on criminal landlords...
Read More →Reply to comment left by Roanch 21 at 11/12/2014 - 16:42
Reply to the comment left by "Roanch 21" at "11/12/2014 - 16:42": Enfield same as Southwark. They wanted both additional licensing and selective licensing. In the "copy my neighbouring labour council's policies" game that Southwark and the East London councils...
Read More →Reply to comment left by John Daley at 11/12/2014 - 16:50
Reply to the comment left by "John Daley" at "11/12/2014 - 16:50": Dear John No judgement was every going to challenge the "terms of the Act". The Courts cannot change Acts of Parliament. The Judge could see that the blatantly...
Read More →11th December 2014, 11 years ago
Thank God this Country still has Judges with intelligence and integrity. John Daley's / Southwark's scheme is a similar disgrace and I pray that it too is struck down and exposed for the self serving, money raising, shafting of landlords...
Read More →20th November 2014, 11 years ago
John - so much of what you say is clearly made up and exaggerated that I am wondering if the purpose of this forum thread is just to wind up landlords and cause them to vent their frustrations and expend...
Read More →Reply to comment left by John Daley at 06/11/2014 - 16:53
Reply to the comment left by "John Daley" at "06/11/2014 - 16:53": Dear John I don't think the consultation is fair or balanced. If it was a balanced consultation it would include contra arguments and would not indulge in blatant...
Read More →Reply to comment left by John Daley at 04/11/2014 - 14:00
Reply to the comment left by "John Daley" at "04/11/2014 - 14:00": Hi John You say "All the voluntary measures have not had any effect on the deterioration of standards and management that is going on". But your own data...
Read More →Reply to comment left by chris wright at 01/11/2014 - 17:21
Reply to the comment left by "chris wright" at "01/11/2014 - 17:21": Hi Chris The fact that the Council undertook 12 housing prosecutions last year is, on its own, largely meaningless. We do not know what these prosecutions were for...
Read More →Reply to comment left by John Daley at 30/10/2014 - 15:44
Reply to the comment left by "John Daley" at "30/10/2014 - 15:44": Hi John Thanks for your reply. I do respect the fact that you are engaging in this debate. Nevertheless, I am convinced you are wrong. I understand that...
Read More →29th October 2014, 11 years ago
There is no statistically significant correlation establish in the consultation document between private sector lettings and anti-social behaviour incidence. The only "link" Southwark have data mined is between housing density and ASB incidence I.e. more people (some of whom receive...
Read More →