Banks Pull the Plug on Lending for Student Housing

Banks Pull the Plug on Lending for Student Housing

16:01 PM, 7th October 2011, About 13 years ago 9

Text Size

"Student housing hits more trouble"

The great rush for student lettings may be ending for the big corporate developers due to fears of over exposure in the market.

Property consultants EC Harris have revealed public spending cuts have drastically hit the student housing sector as universities do not have the cash to finance building more halls.

Private investors are now finding the banks cannot help – and 22 UK and European lenders have indicated they have no more funds for student developments.

The largest UK corporate developers – Unite and UPP – both changed their finance strategies recently to raise funds from shareholders or private institutions other than banks.

Barclays is negotiating the billion pound sale of their slice of UPP to a Dutch bank.

Some large projects are still in the pipeline, but they would already have secured funding.

Tenders are out on a £30 million university project in Salford, Manchester, while plans are under consideration for a £57 million development in Oxford.

Meanwhile, neighbours are protesting about the Oxford Brookes University proposal for a former builder’s yard that call for an amphitheatre, four-storey blocks of student flats and a gym at the bottom of their gardens.

Residents claim the development is too close to their homes and overshadows their two-storey terraced homes.

Other developments facing complaints include controversial plans to convert Peterborough Town Hall in to student housing – while retaining the mayor’s parlour and council chamber for ceremonial functions and meetings.

The local university is not impressed – they say they will not take up the housing as they have met student needs for some time in to the future already.

Councillors want to move public servants to a cheaper, purpose built office block to save money in the face of government spending cuts.

Cambridge students are torn over plans to convert a popular night club into 12 student apartments.

The Fez Club is a well-attended live music venue that students will miss if the plans go through, says Luke Delderfield, of Anglia Ruskin Students’ Union.


Share This Article


Comments

Mary Latham

16:21 PM, 7th October 2011, About 13 years ago

This makes me cross Oxford are using both Article 4 direction and Selective licensing to restrict HMO's in the private sector while allowing this type of development to impact on peoples homes.

chris howells

19:50 PM, 8th October 2011, About 13 years ago

RE STUDENT HOUSING i WAS RECENTLY CONTACTED BY MY MORTGAGE PROVIDER TO INFORM ME THAT I HAD BROKEN THE CONDITIONS OF MY MORTGAGE AS MY HOUSE WAS NOW A LICENCED HMO I AM IN CARDIFF WHERE CONDITIONS AND LICENSING ARE QUITE STRICT. lUCKILY I WAS ABLE TO INFORM MY MRTGAGE PROVIDER THAT THE STUDENTS WERE ON 1 CONTRACT AND NOT INDIVIDUAL CONTRACTS.SEEMS LIKE THEY WANT TO PULL THE PLUG ON STUDENT HOUSING AND LOOKING FOR EXCUSES

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

19:55 PM, 8th October 2011, About 13 years ago

Very interesting! Which lender was that?

chris howells

19:58 PM, 8th October 2011, About 13 years ago

BANK OF IRELAND

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

20:04 PM, 8th October 2011, About 13 years ago

I suspect that story could make National press if you are interested in a name and shame type expose'. We would need evidence of facts but there is no pressure. It's up to you

chris howells

20:33 PM, 8th October 2011, About 13 years ago

It is interesting that whenI bought this particular property in 2004. It was a 4 share. However, interest rates shot to 7% which meant I was runnng at a loss of £150 per month.But I extended with a small permitted developement to ensure that the kitchen was large enough to support a 6 share. I then divided the large sitting room to incorporate 2 more bedrooms. Original mortgage provider was Paragon .However, by doing this I encreased my yield significantly.However, Cardiff City Council has now included selected licensing which means that any propeties within a certain area and are let to 3 or more who are not related are now classed as a HMO This ensures that they get more licensing fees and also that the area because of increased revenue has extra facilities ie rubbish removal etc. I cannot fault Cardif licensing they are helpful to both the landlord and tenant However, they automatically inform the mortgage provider that these properties are now HMOS. When I spoke to Mortgage provider to inform them of one contract they were happy with that they only seem to be concerned with 7 or more occupants and the problems getting them out in case of rent arrears. This rarely happens with students. They have a contract until June and are are given notice to quit almost immediately to combat this problem .

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

20:37 PM, 8th October 2011, About 13 years ago

All's well that ends well then. Thanks for sharing.

5:26 AM, 15th October 2011, About 13 years ago

a house share let on ASTs is in fact let on license due to the clause "exclusive use" is not possible. therefore as with a license, only 7 days notice is needed to evict.

Mary Latham

11:07 AM, 15th October 2011, About 13 years ago

Please read this Blog by Tessa Shepperson.http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/2011/10/12/five-points-on-residential-licenses/
As you will see, from my comment, many landlords make the mistake of thinking that using a contract called a Licence Agreement (not an HMO lIcence) saves them having to use the legal possession process. The fact is that a "house share" on one contract is an AST ragardless of what you call it because the occupiers are, in law, joint Tenants not individual Licencees because collectively they have "exclusive use". Regardless of what you call the agreement the law will call it an AST and if you do not go through legal process when removing these tenants you will have committed Illegal Eviction. A landlord can name the contract anything he wishes, because there is no legal requirement to have a written contract, it is the way in which the landlord manages the tenancy that is regulated by law.

A lender my change the criteria for lending because of their percetion of risk. The National Landlords Association (NLA) are working with LloydsTSB at the moment because Lloyds want to lend to responsible landlords. Lloyds are learning, from attending NLA members meetings, that being a reponsible landlord is about knowing the law and regulation that surrounds our business and that knowledgable landlords are a safer bet regardless of the tenant group or type of tenancy. Hopefully all lenders will begin to look into the knowledge and management skills of the landlord when making their decisions rather than relying on ill informed perception of their risk. Landlords need to build up a professional "profile" in order to evidence that they are a good risk. This includes becoming a member of a respected landlords assocation like NLA and a member of an Accreditation Scheme that is based on education rather than property standards. If there is not a scheme like this in your area the NLA have a national scheme that is open to landlords in any area. See http://www.landlords.org.uk

Selective Licensing will no doubt reduce the supply of affordable homes, not only for students but for low paid workers and single people on LHA. In my opinion Selective Licensing and Article 4 Directives are counter to the needs of all local authorities to encourage investment from landlords to increase the supply and I am certain that it will not be long before these authorties realise that they have shot themselves in the foot. It is time that organisations like Shelter turned their attention to these authorities and asked them to justify their decisions which will increase overheads, and therefore rents, and reduce the supply and choice for those tenants who they are supposed to be protecting.

The road ahead is full of pot holes for landlords and we need to consider where we will invest in future, choosing those authorities who are landlord friendly and supportive of the PRS while leaving those who are not to stew in their own juice. Tesco would not open a store where the authority did not allow them to have a car park why would a landlord buy property where the local authority would increase our overheads and prevent us from letting to our chosen customers?

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now